The Legal Ops Guide to Implementing Legal Tech in 2025

The evolving landscape of legal technology adoption
Pre-implementation assessment: laying the groundwork for success
Building your implementation team
Technology selection and evaluation
Implementation planning and execution
Training and adoption strategies
Measuring success and ROI
Implementation success factors by organization type
Overcoming common implementation challenges
Case studies: successful legal tech implementations
Frequently asked questions
Conclusion: building your implementation roadmap
Bibliography

Want to learn more about Concord?

Book a demo

The evolving landscape of legal technology adoption

The legal technology market is experiencing unprecedented growth, with the total market expected to reach $35.6 billion by 2027, growing at a compound annual growth rate of over 4% according to legal tech market research. This growth reflects a fundamental shift in how legal professionals perceive technology—no longer as a luxury, but as a strategic necessity.

Recent research underscores this evolution, with the 2022 Wolters Kluwer Future Ready Lawyer Survey revealing that 54% of organizations now identify themselves as “Technology Leaders,” up from 40% in 2021. Furthermore, 63% of these technology-leading law firms reported increased profitability compared to their peers.

Despite the clear benefits, successful implementation remains challenging. According to the 2024 ILTA Technology Survey, 54% of respondents cited user resistance as a major barrier to technology adoption, with an equal percentage pointing to skills gaps as significant hurdles.

This article provides a research-backed roadmap for legal teams navigating the complex journey of legal tech implementation, drawing on insights from industry leaders and established best practices.

Pre-implementation assessment: laying the groundwork for success

Defining clear objectives and success metrics

Before selecting any technology solution, legal teams must establish clear, measurable objectives aligned with broader organizational goals. According to Gartner’s research, legal departments that fail to define specific objectives often struggle to justify their technology investments and face difficulty demonstrating ROI.

Zack Hutto, Director at Gartner, emphasizes this point: “While technology promises to ease and automate cumbersome workflows, leaders must do the hard, deliberate work to unearth the problems they need to solve so that technology can be configured and implemented successfully within a particular department’s context.”

When defining objectives, consider:

Efficiency gains (e.g., reducing contract cycle time by 30%)
Cost reduction targets (e.g., decreasing outside counsel spend by 15%)
Risk mitigation goals (e.g., improving compliance rates by 25%)
User adoption metrics (e.g., achieving 80% active usage within six months)

These specific, measurable objectives will serve as the foundation for your implementation strategy and provide clear benchmarks for evaluating success.

Conducting a comprehensive needs assessment

Understanding your organization’s unique needs is critical for selecting the right legal contract management software. According to Thomson Reuters’ research, many legal departments adopt technology without adequately assessing their specific requirements, leading to disappointing results.

To conduct an effective needs assessment:

Map current workflows: Document existing processes to identify inefficiencies and bottlenecks.
Gather stakeholder input: Conduct interviews with legal staff, business users, and IT to understand pain points and requirements.
Analyze data volumes and types: Assess the volume and nature of documents, contracts, and other legal materials managed by your team.
Review current technologies: Evaluate existing tools to identify integration requirements and potential redundancies.

This structured approach ensures you select technology that addresses real organizational needs rather than adopting solutions that may not deliver meaningful value.

Building your implementation team

Cross-functional representation

Successful legal tech implementations require input from various stakeholders across the organization. According to legal tech expert Orsolya Szabó, “Implementing legaltech requires capabilities in the delicate intersection of law, business, technology, design, and overall change management.”

Your implementation team should include:

Legal operations leader: To serve as the primary owner and champion
Technology-focused attorney: To provide legal domain expertise
IT representative: To address technical requirements and integration needs
Finance stakeholder: To assist with ROI calculations and budget planning
End-user representatives: To provide feedback from the user perspective
Executive sponsor: To support the initiative at the leadership level

Clearly define roles and responsibilities for each team member to ensure accountability and avoid confusion during the implementation process.

Engaging the right vendor partner

Selecting a vendor with strong implementation support is crucial for success. When evaluating potential partners, consider their:

Implementation methodology: Assess their approach to requirements gathering, configuration, and deployment.
Support resources: Evaluate the availability and quality of training, documentation, and ongoing support.
Track record: Request case studies and references from organizations similar to yours.
Implementation timeline: Understand realistic timeframes for deployment and reaching full operational capability.

According to industry research, legal tech implementations with dedicated vendor support achieve 40% higher adoption rates than those without such support.

Technology selection and evaluation

Prioritizing user experience

The ILTA Technology Survey consistently identifies user resistance as the primary barrier to successful legal tech adoption, with 41% of respondents citing “Change: Users’ acceptance of change” as their top challenge.

To overcome this hurdle, prioritize solutions with:

Intuitive interfaces: Select technology with familiar, user-friendly designs
Minimal learning curves: Look for solutions that require limited training
Seamless integration: Ensure the solution works well with existing tools
Mobile accessibility: Consider solutions that support remote and mobile work

Jenny McMullen, Corporate Contract Administrator at Yates Construction, highlights the importance of user-friendly interfaces: “All messages and comments live right inside the agreement. Instead of five separate email chains, we’ve got everything in one place now.”

Evaluating total cost of ownership

When comparing contract management software pricing, look beyond the subscription fee to consider the full costs of ownership, including:

Implementation and setup fees
Training expenses
Ongoing support costs
Customization requirements
Integration expenses
Scaling costs as your needs grow

According to Wolters Kluwer research, organizations implementing modern contract lifecycle management software can expect ROI ranging from 300% to 450%, but this varies significantly based on implementation approach and ongoing utilization.

Security and compliance considerations

Security concerns remain a significant factor in legal tech adoption decisions. In the 2024 ILTA Technology Survey, security was identified as a top concern for legal departments, with robust measures like multi-factor authentication and encryption being critical requirements.

When evaluating security, assess:

Data encryption standards (both in transit and at rest)
Access controls and authentication methods
Compliance with relevant regulations (GDPR, CCPA, etc.)
Audit trails and reporting capabilities
Vendor security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.)

Implementation planning and execution

Phased approach to implementation

Research consistently shows that phased implementations have higher success rates than “big bang” approaches. According to Harvard Business Review research cited by industry analysts, phased implementations have a 45% higher success rate than all-at-once approaches.

A typical phased approach includes:

Phase 1: Foundation (1-2 months)

Deploy core contract repository software functionality
Import essential data
Train core users
Establish basic workflows

Phase 2: Process Refinement (2-3 months)

Implement workflow automation
Develop standardized templates
Integrate e-signature capabilities
Expand user training

Phase 3: Advanced Capabilities (3-6 months)

Implement contract analytics software features
Create customized dashboards
Establish automated alerts
Integrate with other business systems

Phase 4: Optimization (Ongoing)

Refine workflows based on user feedback
Implement advanced features
Expand use cases
Measure and report on ROI

This approach allows you to demonstrate value quickly while building toward your full vision, increasing stakeholder confidence and support.

Data migration strategy

Data migration issues account for approximately 24% of implementation delays in legal tech projects, according to industry research. To minimize these challenges:

Prioritize critical data: Focus on active matters and high-value documents first
Establish data standards: Define consistent naming conventions and metadata requirements
Implement quality control processes: Validate migrated data for accuracy and completeness
Train users on new data structures: Ensure they understand how to find information in the new system

A methodical approach to data migration reduces risk and ensures a smoother transition to the new system.

Change management strategy

According to the 2022 ILTA Technology Survey, the top two challenges to technology adoption were “Change: Users’ acceptance of change” (41%) and “Change: Managing expectations (users and management)” (31%).

Effective change management requires:

Clear communication: Articulate the benefits and timeline for implementation
Executive sponsorship: Secure visible support from leadership
User involvement: Include end-users in the selection and configuration process
Comprehensive training: Provide role-specific training in multiple formats
Early wins: Demonstrate quick, meaningful benefits to build momentum

Steve Storck, Purchasing Manager at Denison University, notes: “Concord has all the functionality we need, and we’re still finding even more ways in which it’s useful.” This ongoing discovery of value helps drive continued adoption and engagement.

Training and adoption strategies

Tailored training approaches

One-size-fits-all training rarely succeeds in legal tech implementations. According to Deloitte’s implementation research, effective training programs are tailored to different user groups and learning styles.

Consider these approaches:

Role-based training: Customize content for different roles (attorneys, paralegals, administrators)
Multi-format delivery: Offer live sessions, videos, written guides, and hands-on exercises
Just-in-time resources: Provide quick reference guides and support materials at the point of need
Peer champions: Identify power users who can provide peer support and coaching

Michael Bearman, Chief Legal & Safety Officer at Vecna Robotics, describes the impact of effective training: “I used to have to spend lots of time on this, but now I just hit ‘create document’ because the AI does a great job automatically.”

Driving user adoption

Even the best contract automation software will fail without strong user adoption. According to the 2024 ILTA Technology Survey, 54% of respondents cited user resistance as a significant barrier to technology adoption.

Strategies to drive adoption include:

Focus on benefits: Clearly articulate how the technology will make users’ lives easier
Address resistance directly: Acknowledge concerns and provide solutions
Create incentives: Recognize and reward early adopters and power users
Track usage metrics: Monitor adoption and identify areas needing additional support
Gather feedback: Regularly solicit input on improvements and pain points

Measuring success and ROI

Establishing baseline metrics

To demonstrate ROI, establish baseline metrics before implementation. According to research from Callidus Legal AI, measuring the right metrics is crucial for both operational efficiency and client service.

Key metrics to track include:

Average contract cycle time
Contract administration costs
Time spent searching for contract information
Compliance violation incidents
Number of missed renewal opportunities
Time spent on manual data entry
Legal team capacity utilization

Calculating return on investment

The ROI formula for legal tech investments typically follows this structure:

ROI = ((Total Value of Benefits – Total Costs) / Total Costs) × 100%

According to Wolters Kluwer’s research, organizations implementing contract compliance management software can expect ROI ranging from 300% to 450% if properly implemented.

For example, if a contract management solution costs $50,000 annually but delivers $935,000 in combined benefits, the calculation would be:

ROI = (($935,000 – $50,000) / $50,000) × 100% = 1,770%

This means that for every dollar invested in the solution, the organization receives $17.70 in return—an exceptionally strong business case.

Continuous improvement

The most successful implementations incorporate feedback loops for ongoing improvement. According to Gartner, organizations that implement structured feedback processes are 2.2 times more likely to achieve their implementation goals.

Regular reviews should include:

User surveys and feedback sessions
System usage analytics
Performance against key metrics
Comparison against industry benchmarks
Process improvement workshops

Implementation success factors by organization type

Different types of organizations face unique challenges when implementing legal tech solutions. This table outlines key success factors by organization type:

Organization Type	Primary Challenges	Key Success Factors	Recommended Implementation Timeline
Law Firms	Billable hour concerns, partner buy-in	Demonstrate ROI, phase implementation around trial schedules	3-6 months
Corporate Legal Departments	Cost justification, business alignment	Align with corporate objectives, involve business stakeholders	2-4 months
Healthcare Organizations	Compliance concerns, complex regulations	Focus on security and compliance features, involve compliance officers	4-8 months
Financial Institutions	Strict security requirements, regulatory scrutiny	Prioritize security certifications, implement robust data governance	6-12 months
Government Agencies	Procurement constraints, legacy systems	Follow incremental approach, focus on integration capabilities	8-12 months

Tailoring your implementation approach to your organization’s specific context significantly improves success rates and accelerates time to value.

Overcoming common implementation challenges

Addressing resistance to change

Resistance to change remains the primary obstacle to successful legal tech implementation. According to the 2024 ILTA Technology Survey, 54% of legal professionals cited resistance to change as a significant barrier to technology adoption.

Strategies to overcome resistance include:

Involve users early: Include end-users in the selection and configuration process
Communicate benefits: Clearly articulate how the technology will make their jobs easier
Provide comprehensive training: Ensure users feel confident using the new system
Start with champions: Identify enthusiastic early adopters to drive peer-to-peer adoption
Address concerns directly: Listen to objections and provide solutions

Managing integration challenges

Integration issues can significantly impact implementation success. According to Gartner’s research, no single vendor provides all the legal software most large organizations need, making integration capabilities critical.

To manage integration challenges:

Conduct thorough compatibility assessments: Before purchasing, verify compatibility with existing systems
Involve IT early: Engage your IT team from the beginning to address technical requirements
Prioritize APIs and connectors: Select vendors with robust integration capabilities
Test integrations thoroughly: Verify data flows correctly between systems before full deployment
Plan for data synchronization: Establish clear rules for how data flows between systems

Balancing innovation with practicality

While emerging technologies like AI offer exciting possibilities, balancing innovation with practical implementation is essential. According to Thomson Reuters’ 2025 Generative AI in Professional Services Report, 26% of legal organizations are actively using generative AI, but only 20% are measuring ROI for these tools.

To strike the right balance:

Start with proven use cases: Focus on well-established applications before exploring cutting-edge features
Pilot new capabilities: Test innovative features with a small group before wider deployment
Measure outcomes: Establish clear metrics to evaluate the impact of new capabilities
Gather user feedback: Regularly solicit input on the practical value of innovative features
Adjust based on results: Be willing to pivot if certain innovations don’t deliver as expected

Case studies: successful legal tech implementations

Fast implementation at Yates Construction

Yates Construction, a company with 5,000 employees across 15 regional divisions, faced significant challenges with decentralized contract management processes. By implementing Concord’s contract management software, they achieved:

$15,000 monthly savings in reduced administrative overhead
25% reduction in contract administration costs
Dramatic reduction in contract turnaround times from weeks to hours
Improved business continuity during staff transitions

Jenny McMullen, Corporate Contract Administrator at Yates Construction, notes: “Concord gets our projects moving much faster.”

Efficiency gains at Denison University

Denison University, a liberal arts college managing over 4,000 contracts annually, implemented a contract management solution to streamline their processes. The results included:

30% reduction in time spent correcting and organizing contracts
Significant improvement in contract turnaround time
Enhanced visibility into contract data for better decision-making
Improved vendor negotiations leading to cost savings

Steve Storck, Purchasing Manager at Denison University, commented on the implementation success: “Concord has all the functionality we need, and we’re still finding even more ways in which it’s useful.”

Grant funding success at Pima Community College

Pima Community College relied heavily on grants and contracts for 20% of its annual operating budget but faced challenges with fragmented communication and inefficient workflows. After implementing procurement contract management software, they achieved:

Significant reduction in General Counsel approval times
Shortened contract development cycles
Increased success rate for grant applications
Additional funding for critical student programs

This case study demonstrates how effective implementation, focusing on both technology and organizational change, can deliver substantial strategic value.

Frequently asked questions

What is the typical timeline for a legal tech implementation?

Implementation timelines vary significantly based on solution complexity, organizational readiness, and integration requirements. According to industry research, typical timeframes range from:

1-3 months for standalone solutions
3-6 months for moderately complex implementations
6-12 months for enterprise-wide, fully integrated platforms

Some modern solutions, like Concord, can be implemented in as little as a single day, while more complex platforms may take 6+ months. Schedule a contract management software demo to learn more about specific implementation timelines.

How can we measure the ROI of our legal tech investment?

Measuring ROI requires tracking both costs and benefits. Key metrics include:

Time savings: Multiply hours saved by hourly rates
Cost reduction: Measure decreased outside counsel spend
Error reduction: Calculate the value of avoided mistakes
Efficiency gains: Track increased throughput and capacity

According to Wolters Kluwer research, organizations implementing legal technology solutions should aim for a minimum 3:1 benefit-to-cost ratio, or a 300% ROI.

What are the key factors that determine implementation success?

Research from multiple sources identifies several critical success factors:

Clear business case and objectives
Strong executive sponsorship
Engaged stakeholders across functions
Comprehensive change management
Adequate resource allocation
Phased implementation approach
User-focused training and support
Integration with existing systems

Organizations that address all these factors report 3.4 times higher satisfaction with their implementations compared to those that neglect them.

How should we approach training for different user groups?

Different user groups require tailored training approaches:

Power users: Comprehensive training on advanced features, system administration, and troubleshooting
Regular users: Focused training on day-to-day tasks with hands-on exercises
Occasional users: Just-in-time training on specific functions they need, with easily accessible reference materials
Executives: High-level overview focusing on reporting capabilities and strategic benefits

According to Deloitte’s implementation research, organizations with role-specific training programs achieve 82% higher user adoption compared to those with one-size-fits-all approaches.

How can we ensure strong user adoption?

A McKinsey study cited in industry research found that implementations with robust change management achieved 79% higher adoption rates. Key strategies include:

Involve users in the selection process
Communicate clear benefits specific to each user group
Provide comprehensive, role-specific training
Establish super-users who can provide peer support
Create quick reference guides and self-service resources
Recognize and celebrate adoption
Collect and act on user feedback

These approaches help overcome the resistance to change that ILTA surveys consistently identify as the primary barrier to successful legal tech adoption.

Conclusion: building your implementation roadmap

Implementing legal technology is a journey that requires careful planning, cross-functional collaboration, and ongoing commitment. By developing a comprehensive roadmap that addresses technology selection, change management, process optimization, and measurement, legal teams can transform how they manage their work and deliver greater value to their organizations.

The research is clear: organizations that approach legal tech implementation strategically achieve significantly better outcomes. According to the 2022 Wolters Kluwer Future Ready Lawyer Survey, 63% of technology-leading law firms reported increased profitability—more than any other firms.

As you embark on your implementation journey, remember that success comes not just from selecting the right technology but from thoughtfully managing the people and process aspects of change. With the roadmap outlined in this guide, your legal team can navigate the implementation process with confidence and achieve your desired outcomes.

Organizations seeking to maximize their implementation success should consider exploring best contract lifecycle management software options that offer comprehensive features, strong implementation support, and proven ROI. For organizations in regulated industries, specialized solutions like healthcare contract management software provide industry-specific capabilities that address unique compliance requirements.

Table of contents

Want to learn more about Concord?