Ironclad is designed for large enterprises — and it has the complexity to match.

Ironclad is geared towards comprehensive contract lifecycle management. While it stands out for its robust features, that power comes with a steep learning curve. With Ironclad:

• Setup is likely to take weeks or even months of work.
• Templates and workflows require in-depth support.
• Pricing increases rapidly with more users and features.

If you’re looking for a highly customized contract solution, Ironclad is one of the heaviest hitters on the market. But for many users, that level of customization creates its own challenges.

Switch to Concord and get everyone signing effortlessly, today.

Request demo

Concord vs Ironclad features comparison

Is Concord cheaper than Ironclad?

Ironclad’s pricing, geared towards large enterprises, is tailored to each organization’s specific needs. This customization means that the cost can increase significantly with added features and users. The platform does not list its prices publicly, and requires you to book a sales demo to get a custom quote.

Concord, in contrast, offers a more straightforward and transparent pricing model. The Essentials plan, at $49 per user per month, includes a comprehensive set of features suitable for contract lifecycle management. This plan covers unlimited e-signatures, documents, and access for guests, alongside collaboration tools and a contract repository.

For businesses scaling up, Concord maintains a predictable pricing structure. Unlike Ironclad, which has steeper cost increments, Concord’s upgrades are priced consistently. This makes Concord a more cost-effective choice for businesses requiring advanced features like full-text search and deadline alerts, which are included in all Concord’s pricing plans.

“Ironclad and Concord – which has better support?

Ironclad users express mixed feelings about the platform’s customer support. Some users have found the support team helpful for document preparation, while others have noted that the support is not always responsive. Verified reviewers say the support quality varies by account size, and that users from smaller accounts are often redirected to “self-serve” help docs.

Concord, in contrast, receives consistently positive reviews for its customer support. Users commend the responsiveness and reliability of Concord’s support team. The helpful and non-aggressive approach of Concord’s sales team is also noted, indicating a customer-centric approach to support, for companies of all sizes.

In short, while Ironclad offers robust contract management capabilities, its support experiences seem to vary depending on the user’s account size. Concord, on the other hand, consistently receives five-star feedback for its customer support, highlighting a more uniformly positive support experience for its users.

Ironclad or Concord — which is better for growing businesses?

Ironclad, primarily known for its comprehensive contract management capabilities, might be more than a growing business needs. It’s focused on extensive contract lifecycle management, making it more suitable for larger enterprises or businesses with complex legal needs. The platform’s custom pricing and potential complexity might not align well with the budget and simplicity required by growing businesses.

Concord, on the other hand, is frequently praised for its suitability for growing businesses. It offers a straightforward pricing structure and a wide range of features essential for contract management, without overwhelming users with unnecessary complexity. Concord’s Essentials plan, at $49 per user per month, includes unlimited e-signatures and documents, alongside collaboration tools and a contract repository, making it a value-packed choice.

For growing businesses looking for an end-to-end budget-friendly contract management solution, Concord often turns out to be a better fit. Its combination of essential features, intuitive interface, and predictable pricing makes it a more practical choice for growing businesses, compared to Ironclad’s complex enterprise-focused offerings.

Key differences between Ironclad and Concord

Key differences between Ironclad and Concord break out into three key areas.

• Target audience: Ironclad caters primarily to larger enterprises with complex legal needs, offering robust tools for contract management. Concord is designed to serve a broader range of business sizes, including growing companies, with its all-in-one contract lifecycle management platform.
• Pricing structure: Ironclad’s pricing is customized, tailored to the specific needs of each organization, which could make it potentially more expensive as requirements grow. Concord offers a more transparent and linear pricing model, with plans starting at $49 per user per month, and including all core contract management features.
• User experience and learning curve: Ironclad, with its comprehensive features, has a steep learning curve for most users. Concord is widely considered more user-friendly, suitable for businesses of various sizes looking for a comprehensive yet intuitive contract management platform.

While Ironclad might be more suited for large enterprises with complex contract management needs, Concord offers a balanced solution for a variety of businesses — especially those looking for a comprehensive toolset at a predictable cost.