• Familiar user interface
• Self-service platform
• Fast onboarding
• Redlining in-app
• Collaboration with counterparties
• Unlimited e-signatures

• Setup in less than a day (compared to months for Agiloft)
• Intuitive interface that feels like using Gmail
• Built-in e-signature that eliminates extra DocuSign costs
• AI that extracts key contract data automatically

Features: What can they actually do?

Concord and Agiloft serve different contract management needs with distinct approaches:

Feature comparison table

Agiloft: Deep customization with complexity

Agiloft provides a deeply customizable contract management software platform that features:

• No-code platform for extensive customization

• Powerful workflow automation

• Strong compliance and security features

• Comprehensive contract repository

• GenAI capabilities for contract analysis

The significant drawback? The platform’s complexity translates to lengthy implementation times measured in months rather than days. According to a direct comparison from Concord, “Agiloft’s deep customizability means it takes organizations months to implement.”

As one reviewer states on SoftwareReviews: “We have been disappointed so for with their AI functionality. I think we expected the solution to ‘index’ or categorise the clauses in each contract automatically.”

Concord: Complete contract management without the complexity

Concord delivers end-to-end contract lifecycle management software that emphasizes usability without sacrificing power:

• Contract creation with templates and clause libraries

• Real-time negotiation with comments and tracked changes

• Built-in electronic signature (no extra DocuSign fees)

• Comprehensive approval workflows

• Advanced analytics and reporting

The most significant differentiator? Concord balances powerful functionality with a user-friendly interface, implementing in under a day rather than months.

Implementation: How fast can you get started?

The time required to get a contract management system up and running represents one of the most dramatic differences between these platforms:

Implementation comparison table

Agiloft requires substantial investment in implementation time, with projects typically taking 2-3 months. The platform’s extensive customization options create complexity that requires specialized expertise and dedicated project management.

Concord has revolutionized the implementation experience with a streamlined process that gets customers up and running in less than a day. This rapid time-to-value means teams can start using the platform immediately while still getting the full benefits of a comprehensive CLM solution.

The striking difference in implementation time creates a significant competitive advantage for Concord, particularly for organizations that need to address contract management challenges quickly without lengthy project timelines and consulting engagements.

User experience: Will people actually use it?

Even powerful software fails if nobody wants to use it:

User experience comparison table

Agiloft offers a powerful but complex interface that requires substantial training and onboarding. Users typically need extensive guidance to navigate its many features.

As noted in a Capterra review: “The UI can use a lot of improvement. A lot of the simple steps are unnecessarily complicated.”

Concord balances powerful functionality with a user-friendly approach that emphasizes quick adoption:

• An interface that “feels like Gmail” according to users

• Intuitive navigation despite robust feature set

• Mobile apps for on-the-go contract management

• Contextual help that guides users through processes

As one G2 reviewer puts it in their review of Concord: “I like that the format is similar to gmail, so it is simple, and intuitive to use.”

The fundamental difference in user experience philosophy creates a stark contrast in adoption rates and team satisfaction with the chosen platform.

AI capabilities: Compare the intelligence

Both platforms leverage AI to enhance contract management, but with different approaches and capabilities:

AI capabilities comparison table

Agiloft has recently expanded its AI capabilities with features like:

• ConvoAI Document Q&A for natural language interaction with contracts

• GenAI Prompt Lab for customizable AI templates

• Integration with large language models (LLMs)

According to a press release, Agiloft’s “AI Your Way” initiative “allows customers to tailor AI-powered workflows to fit their specific needs.”

Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform offers a more integrated approach to AI:

• Comprehensive data extraction with validation

• Risk identification and flagging

• Compliance monitoring

• Obligation tracking

• Performance analytics and insights

The key difference is implementation complexity – Concord’s AI features work out of the box, while Agiloft’s require substantial configuration and training.

Integrations: Playing nice with your tech stack

The ability to connect with your existing tools is crucial for any contract solution:

Integration comparison table

Agiloft offers integrations with major platforms, as listed on GetApp:

• Microsoft Outlook, Word, Excel, Azure, 365

• Google Docs, Maps

• DocuSign

• Salesforce Sales Cloud

• QuickBooks Online Advanced

• Various identity management tools

However, many integrations require additional configuration and may only be available in higher-tier plans.

Concord provides a much more extensive contract automation software ecosystem with over 5,000 connected applications:

• Native Salesforce integration with bidirectional data flow

• HubSpot integration for marketing and sales alignment

• Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, and OneDrive for document storage

• Slack integration for real-time notifications

• Microsoft Teams connectivity

• Zapier connection to 7,000+ apps

• Robust API for custom integrations

For teams with complex tech stacks, Concord’s integration capabilities create a more seamless workflow across systems without requiring extensive technical configuration.

Pricing: What will it cost?

The pricing models for these platforms differ substantially:

Pricing comparison table

Agiloft uses a traditional enterprise pricing model with annual contracts and custom quotes. According to research from HyperStart, pricing starts around $6,000 per year for basic implementations but can quickly scale to $60,000 for enterprise deployments, depending on customization and integration needs.

This pricing structure follows the enterprise software model of significant upfront and ongoing investment.

Concord starts at $399/month with a flexible structure based on your specific needs. All plans include unlimited e-signatures and document storage, with features that scale as you grow.

The dramatic difference in entry price point makes Concord much more accessible, particularly for growing organizations that can’t commit to large annual contracts with extensive implementation costs.

For detailed pricing information tailored to your organization, you can explore Concord’s pricing details.

ROI and business impact

Ultimately, the value of any software investment must be measured by its impact on business outcomes:

ROI comparison table

Agiloft can deliver strong ROI once fully implemented, but the lengthy setup time and high initial costs create a delayed return on investment. Organizations typically don’t see significant benefits for 6-12 months after starting the implementation process.

Concord delivers more immediate returns through:

• Rapid implementation with under 1 day setup

• Immediate adoption due to intuitive interface

• Built-in e-signature functionality

• Streamlined negotiation and execution

• Reduced legal review requirements

According to research shared on Concord’s procurement software page, “For every dollar invested in contract management software, companies can expect to generate between $91 and $183 in recovered revenue.”

Industry research shows that organizations implementing CLM software typically aim for a minimum 3:1 benefit-to-cost ratio, or a 300% ROI, according to Concord’s procurement guide.

Market position and expert recognition

Both platforms have established positions in the contract management market:

Market position comparison

Agiloft has established itself as a recognized player in the CLM market, with strong analyst recognition. According to PeerSpot data, Agiloft’s market mindshare is around 3.2-3.4% as of early 2025, showing a decline from 4.0% the previous year.

Concord has grown rapidly to establish a 14.23% market share in the contract management space according to 6sense data, making it a leading player in the industry.

The market trends show Concord gaining ground quickly due to its user-friendly approach and rapid implementation times, while Agiloft maintains a position with enterprises willing to invest in extensive customization.

Which one is right for you?

The best contract lifecycle management software depends on your specific needs:

Overall comparison: At-a-glance decision matrix

Choose Agiloft if:

• You have a large budget for implementation and consulting

• Your timeline allows for months of configuration before going live

• You have very specific customization needs that require a truly blank slate

• You have technical resources dedicated to managing the system long-term

• You’re willing to invest in extensive training for all users

Choose Concord if:

• You need to implement contract management quickly

• You want high user adoption rates without extensive training

• You need end-to-end contract lifecycle management

• You want to eliminate separate e-signature costs

• You need robust integrations with your tech stack

• You want AI-powered insights available immediately

Most organizations find that Concord delivers significantly more value without the implementation complexity, extended timelines, and high costs of traditional enterprise CLM platforms like Agiloft.

Want to see Concord in action? Request a demo tailored to your specific use cases and requirements.

Frequently asked questions about Concord vs. Agiloft

Bibliography

1. Concord vs. Agiloft Comparison

2. SoftwareReviews: Agiloft CLM Suite

3. Capterra: Agiloft Reviews

4. G2: Concord Reviews

5. HyperStart: Agiloft Pricing Guide

6. GetApp: Agiloft Integrations

7. Concord: Contract Automation Software

8. Concord: Contract Analytics Software

9. Concord: Contract Management Software Pricing

10. PeerSpot: Agiloft vs. Concord Comparison

11. 6sense: Concord Market Share

12. PRNewswire: Agiloft AI Capabilities

13. Concord: Procurement Contract Management Software

14. Concord: Best Contract Lifecycle Management Software