Feature | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
Approval workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
Audit trails | ✓ | ✓ |
Internal/public discussion | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrations with Salesforce, Google Drive, Box, and Dropbox | ✓ | ✓ |
Open API | ✓ | ✓ |
Market share (contract management) | 14.23% | 0.31% |
Unlimited storage | ✓ | ✗ |
Universal easy-to-learn interface | ✓ | ✗ |
Generate and send multiple contracts at once | ✓ | ✓ |
E-signature | Native (included) | Limited |
Transparent pricing | ✓ | ✗ |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf, .html | .docx, .pdf |
Implementation time | 1-2 days | 30+ days |
Starting price | $399/month | Custom pricing (contact sales) |
Features: What can they actually do?
Concord and Evisort serve different contract management needs:
Feature comparison table
Feature | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Contract repository | ✓ Secure, centralized storage with unlimited capacity | ✓ Secure, centralized storage with volume limits |
Document search | ✓ Intuitive search with user-friendly filtering | ✓ Advanced AI search requiring technical setup |
OCR technology | ✓ Intelligent document processing | ✓ Advanced OCR with limitations on low-quality documents |
Email alerts | ✓ Comprehensive alert system | ✓ Basic notification system with limited customization |
Contract creation | ✓ Intuitive template-based authoring | ✓ Template-based authoring with technical setup |
Negotiation tools | ✓ Real-time collaboration & redlining | ✓ Limited real-time collaboration |
E-signature | ✓ Built-in e-signature at no additional cost | ✓ Limited e-signature capabilities |
Workflow automation | ✓ User-friendly custom workflows | ✓ Complex workflow configuration |
AI capabilities | ✓ Agreement Intelligence platform | ✓ Machine Learning with advanced training requirements |
Analytics | ✓ Advanced analytics & actionable insights | ✓ Limited customizable reporting |
Mobile access | ✓ Intuitive mobile applications | ✓ Limited mobile functionality |
API access | ✓ Developer-friendly API ecosystem | ✓ Complex API requiring technical expertise |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf, .html | .docx, .pdf |
Evisort: The AI specialization approach
Evisort focuses heavily on artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities for contract analysis:
Advanced document processing and data extraction
Strong OCR capabilities for automated analysis
AI-trained models for legal language understanding
Limited e-signature capabilities
Enterprise-focused deployment model
Where organizations often encounter challenges:
Complex implementation requiring technical resources
Limited customization in reports and dashboards
OCR struggles with low-quality documents
Restrictive pricing model with limited transparency
According to market research from 6sense, Evisort holds approximately 0.31% of the contract management market share as of 2025, with a primarily enterprise-focused customer base (6sense, 2025).
One Evisort customer noted on Capterra: “It was very challenging to even get ballpark cost estimates for several weeks. My inability to bring even roughed-out potential price ranges back to my team created a lot of internal problems” (Capterra, 2025).
Concord: Complete contract management
Our platform delivers end-to-end contract lifecycle management covering:
Intuitive contract creation with templates and clause libraries
Seamless real-time negotiation with comments and tracked changes
Integrated electronic signature at no additional cost
Straightforward approval workflows
Actionable analytics and reporting
The most significant differentiator? Concord offers an intuitive user experience with implementation measured in days rather than months, while delivering the comprehensive capabilities that modern organizations need.
A customer from a global real estate company explains: “Concord was able to answer every single question when asked. Unlike competitors, who had to schedule weeks ahead to get AI experts on the phone. We quickly realized that choosing Concord would de-risk the timeline and find success.”
Implementation: How fast can you get started?
The time and resources required to implement a contract management solution represent a significant factor in the total cost of ownership:
Implementation comparison table
Implementation Aspect | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Average setup time | 1-2 days | 30+ days |
Technical expertise required | Minimal | Significant |
Implementation process | Streamlined with success team guidance | Complex, consultant-driven |
User training requirements | Intuitive interface with minimal training | Extensive technical training required |
Data migration complexity | Automated data mapping | Complex manual configuration |
Custom configuration | User-friendly setup | Technical setup requiring specialists |
Time to first value | 1-3 days | 30+ days |
Implementation resources | Dedicated success managers, efficient training | Technical consultants, extensive training program |
Evisort implementation typically takes 30+ days to complete, according to customer testimonials. The process requires significant technical resources and specialized expertise to configure the AI components correctly.
One reviewer notes on Capterra that while Evisort offers powerful capabilities, “The system does not recognize users to register them as contract administrator” and configuration can be challenging (Capterra, 2025).
Concord takes a fundamentally different approach with a 1-2 day implementation that includes proper workflow setup and integration with existing systems. This dramatic efficiency difference delivers immediate business value without the extended deployment timeline.
Our streamlined onboarding process ensures customers can begin realizing value almost immediately, with minimal disruption to existing workflows.
User experience: Will people actually use it?
Even the most powerful software fails to deliver value if user adoption is weak:
User experience comparison table
UX Aspect | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Interface design | Clean, intuitive layout | Complex, AI-focused interface |
Learning curve | Low to moderate | Steep |
User onboarding | Self-guided with support options | Requires consultant-driven training |
Mobile experience | Fully-featured mobile apps | Limited mobile functionality |
Personalization | User-friendly configuration | Technical configuration process |
Accessibility | Enhanced accessibility options | Basic accessibility features |
Interface feedback | “Intuitive like Gmail” | “Technical but powerful” |
User adoption challenges | High adoption rates | Significant training requirements |
Support resources | Interactive guides, responsive support | Technical documentation, tiered support |
Evisort offers extensive AI-powered functionality wrapped in a complex interface. Reviewers note the platform can be difficult to navigate and may create productivity bottlenecks for teams without technical expertise.
According to user feedback on Capterra: “Reports and dashboards are not customizable. There are workarounds like creating custom searches and lists, but generating custom reports would be a really nice feature” (Capterra, 2025).
Concord takes a different approach by balancing power with usability:
An interface that feels like Gmail for maximum familiarity
Intuitive navigation that reduces training requirements
Mobile apps designed for productivity on-the-go
Contextual guidance that helps users accomplish tasks
Users consistently praise Concord’s intuitive design and ease of use, leading to higher adoption rates and faster time-to-value.
AI capabilities: Smart contract management
AI is transforming contract management in 2025, with significant differences in implementation approach:
AI capabilities comparison table
AI Capability | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Data extraction | ✓ Comprehensive extraction with validation | ✓ Advanced data extraction with technical setup |
OCR technology | ✓ Advanced intelligent document processing | ✓ OCR with limitations on low-quality documents |
Risk identification | ✓ Automated risk flagging and scoring | ✓ Manual risk identification |
Compliance monitoring | ✓ AI-powered compliance checking | ✓ Basic compliance validation |
Contract analysis | ✓ Deep semantic analysis | ✓ Technical machine learning analysis |
Obligation extraction | ✓ Comprehensive obligation management | ✓ Basic obligation tracking |
Performance analytics | ✓ AI-driven performance insights | ✓ Limited customizable reporting |
Benchmarking | ✓ Industry-specific benchmarking | ✓ Limited benchmarking capabilities |
Processing speed | Immediate results | Variable processing times |
Accuracy improvement | 90%+ accuracy with continuous learning | Depends on document quality |
AI training model | Pre-trained with industry-specific learning | Requires extensive custom training |
Evisort focuses heavily on machine learning capabilities:
Advanced document processing and extraction
Technical OCR implementation
Complex AI configuration requirements
Reviewers note that “Evisort functionality could stand to improve their artificial intelligence when it comes to pulling some of the more complex provisions with nuanced timelines” and “OCR struggles to pick up information on low-quality PDFs” (HyperStart, 2025).
Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform delivers:
Comprehensive data extraction with verification
Automated risk identification and flagging
Continuous compliance monitoring
Complete obligation tracking
Actionable performance insights
Our pre-trained AI models require minimal configuration while delivering superior results across a wide range of document types and conditions.
Integrations: Playing nice with your tech stack
The ability to connect seamlessly with existing tools drives significant value in contract management:
Integration comparison table
Integration Type | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
CRM Systems | ✓ Salesforce (bidirectional with advanced workflows)<br>✓ HubSpot (native integration)<br>✓ Microsoft Dynamics 365 (via Zapier)<br>✓ Pipedrive (via Zapier) | ✓ Salesforce (basic integration)<br>✓ Limited support for other CRMs |
E-Signature | ✓ Native e-signature (included)<br>✓ Compatible with external e-signature tools | ✓ Limited e-signature capabilities<br>✓ Third-party integrations required |
Cloud Storage | ✓ Google Drive (native)<br>✓ Dropbox (native)<br>✓ Box (native)<br>✓ OneDrive (native) | ✓ Basic cloud storage connections |
Collaboration Tools | ✓ Slack (native)<br>✓ Microsoft Teams (via Zapier)<br>✓ Asana (via Zapier) | ✓ Limited collaboration tool support |
Identity Management | ✓ SAML 2.0, LDAP, Azure AD | ✓ Basic identity management |
Automation Platform | ✓ Zapier integration to 7000+ apps | ✓ Limited middleware options |
API Access | ✓ Developer-friendly API | ✓ Complex API requiring technical expertise |
Implementation Complexity | Low – connects in minutes | High – requires technical resources |
Evisort offers integration focused primarily on:
Basic Salesforce connection
Limited e-signature integration
Selected enterprise systems
Minimal collaboration tools
Concord provides an extensive integration ecosystem:
Straightforward Salesforce connection with bidirectional data flow
HubSpot integration for marketing and sales alignment
Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, and OneDrive for document storage
Slack integration for real-time notifications
Microsoft Teams connectivity
Zapier connection to 7,000+ apps
Developer-friendly API
According to market intelligence from 6sense, Concord has captured a 14.23% market share in the contract management space compared to Evisort’s 0.31%, partially due to this integration flexibility (6sense, 2025).
For teams with diverse tech stacks, our integration capabilities create a more seamless workflow across different business functions.
Pricing: What will it cost?
The financial impact of contract management platforms extends far beyond the monthly subscription:
Pricing comparison table
Pricing Aspect | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Pricing model | Transparent, predictable structure | Enterprise-only pricing |
Starting price | $399/month | Custom pricing requiring sales engagement |
Entry-level plan | Essential: $399/month | Not available to small businesses |
Mid-tier plan | Professional: Custom pricing | Custom pricing only |
Advanced plan | Enterprise: Custom pricing | Custom pricing only |
User limitations | Flexible user model | Complex user permissioning |
Contract volume limits | Flexible scaling options | Tiered volume pricing |
Additional costs | Minimal implementation costs | Substantial implementation, consulting, training fees |
Pricing transparency | Published pricing structure | Limited transparency, enterprise sales model |
Free trial | Demo available | Demo only |
Annual discount | Available | Available |
Evisort employs a complex enterprise pricing model that typically requires engaging with sales for a custom quote. Customer feedback indicates considerable challenge in obtaining even basic pricing information, with one reviewer noting, “It was very challenging to even get ballpark cost estimates for several weeks” (Capterra, 2025).
Implementation costs, training, and ongoing consulting often represent a substantial portion of the total investment, frequently extending the budget well beyond initial expectations.
Concord starts at $399/month with a transparent structure based on your specific requirements. All plans include unlimited e-signatures and document storage, with features that scale as your organization grows.
Our transparent pricing model eliminates surprise costs and enables organizations to budget with confidence.
ROI and business impact
The ultimate measure of any software investment is its impact on business outcomes:
ROI comparison table
ROI Factor | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Time-to-value | Fast (days to weeks) | Slow (months+) |
Implementation costs | Low to moderate | High |
Administrative savings | 50-70% reduction in admin time | 30-50% reduction in admin time |
Contract cycle time reduction | 40-75% reduction in cycle time | 20-40% reduction in cycle time |
Renewal opportunity capture | Comprehensive renewal management | Basic renewal tracking |
Risk mitigation value | Proactive risk identification | Technical risk analysis |
Revenue impact | Direct revenue acceleration | Indirect cost efficiency |
Compliance benefits | Comprehensive compliance transformation | Technical compliance improvements |
Strategic insights | Actionable business intelligence | Technical data extraction |
Typical ROI timeframe | 3-6 months | 12+ months |
ROI multiplier | High (91-183x per dollar invested) | Moderate (requires significant investment) |
Evisort delivers value primarily through:
Technical AI capabilities for document analysis
Data extraction from contract documents
Enterprise-focused workflow capabilities
Basic risk analysis tools
However, the extended implementation timeline and significant technical requirements can delay ROI realization, with some customers noting 30+ days before seeing initial value.
Concord delivers more rapid returns through:
Complete lifecycle efficiency improvements
Accelerated contract creation and approval
Streamlined negotiation and execution
Significant legal resource optimization
Strategic insights driving business decisions
For every dollar invested in our contract management solution, companies typically generate between $91 and $183 in recovered revenue.
Market position and future growth
The contract management software market is experiencing significant growth, with important trends to note:
Market position comparison
Market Aspect | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Market share | 14.23% (leading position) | 0.31% |
Customer base | 1,368+ companies (diverse industries) | 37 companies (primarily enterprise) |
Industry focus | Cross-industry versatility | Limited industry specialization |
Target company size | SMB through enterprise | Enterprise focus |
Geographic strength | Global presence (87% in US) | Limited geographic coverage |
Growth trajectory | Rapid expansion | Limited growth |
Key competitors | DocuSign CLM, SAP Ariba, Deltek | DocuSign CLM, Concord, Conga |
AI development | Industry-leading capabilities | Technical AI focus |
Market perception | Innovative, user-friendly | Complex, technical |
The global contract lifecycle management market is projected to grow significantly, with analyst forecasts showing:
Growth from $1.07 billion in 2024 to $3.46 billion by 2034, at a CAGR of 12.4% (Fact.MR, 2024)
Market expectations reaching $2.66 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 12.25% (Mordor Intelligence, 2025)
Healthcare CLM specifically projected to reach $9.68 billion by 2032 (Data Bridge Market Research, 2025)
According to 6sense, the top alternatives for Evisort in contract management are Concord (20.79% market share), Deltek Costpoint (9.84%), and SAP Ariba Contracts (8.30%) (6sense, 2025).
Which one is right for you?
The best contract lifecycle management software depends on your specific requirements:
Overall comparison: At-a-glance decision matrix
Factor | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Best suited for | • Organizations valuing rapid implementation<br>• Teams seeking intuitive user experience<br>• Businesses requiring comprehensive integrations<br>• Companies of all sizes | • Large enterprises with significant technical resources<br>• Organizations with dedicated AI specialists<br>• Companies with extensive implementation timelines<br>• Businesses with large technical budgets |
Implementation time | 1-2 days | 30+ days |
Pricing model | Transparent, flexible structure | Complex enterprise model with hidden costs |
Starting price | $399/month | Enterprise pricing (contact sales) |
User experience | Intuitive, Gmail-like interface | Complex with steep learning curve |
AI capabilities | Comprehensive Agreement Intelligence | Technical machine learning focus |
Integration breadth | Extensive ecosystem (7000+ apps) | Limited enterprise integrations |
Customization | User-friendly configuration | Complex technical setup |
Mobile support | Fully-featured mobile applications | Limited mobile capabilities |
Customer support | Responsive success team | Technical support model |
ROI timeline | Rapid value realization | Extended payback period |
Evisort might be appropriate if:
Your organization has dedicated technical AI specialists
You can accommodate a 30+ day deployment timeline
Your budget can absorb substantial implementation and training costs
Your contracts require highly specialized AI analysis
Concord is ideal for:
Organizations seeking end-to-end contract lifecycle management
Teams valuing rapid implementation and time-to-value
Businesses requiring intuitive user experience
Companies needing comprehensive tech stack integration
Organizations focusing on user adoption and productivity
Teams looking for advanced AI-powered insights without technical complexity
Most growing organizations find that Concord delivers significantly more value without the implementation complexity and budget concerns associated with technically-focused platforms.
Ready to experience the difference? Request a demo tailored to your specific use cases and requirements.
Frequently asked questions about Concord vs. Evisort
Bibliography
6sense. (2025). Concord vs Evisort: Contract Management Comparison.
6sense. (2025). Concord – Market Share, Competitor Insights in Contract Management.
HyperStart. (2025). Evisort Pricing 2025: Plans, Features, & Reviews.
Capterra. (2025). Evisort Reviews 2025: Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons.
Fact.MR. (2024). Contract Lifecycle Management Market Forecast.
Mordor Intelligence. (2025). Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market Growth Trends.
Data Bridge Market Research. (2025). Healthcare Contract Management Software: The 2025 Guide.