Feature | Concord | ContractWorks |
---|---|---|
Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
Approval workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
Audit trails | ✓ | ✓ |
Internal/public discussion | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrations with Salesforce | ✓ | ✓ |
Open API | ✓ | ✗ |
Unlimited storage | ✓ | ✓ |
Universal easy-to-learn interface | ✓ | ✓ |
Generate and send multiple contracts at once | ✓ | ✗ |
Clause library | ✓ | ✗ |
Edit in-app | ✓ | ✗ |
Native e-signature | ✓ | ✓ |
Transparent pricing | ✓ | ✓ |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf, .html | .docx, .pdf |
Implementation time | 1-2 days | 1-7 days |
Starting price | $399/month | $700/month |
Features: What can they actually do?
ContractWorks and Concord serve different contract management needs:
Feature comparison table
Feature | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Contract repository | ✓ Secure, centralized storage | ✓ Secure, centralized storage |
Document search | ✓ AI-powered full-text search | ✓ Advanced search with filtering |
OCR technology | ✓ Automatic for all documents | ✓ Intelligent document processing |
Email alerts | ✓ Customizable notifications | ✓ Comprehensive alert system |
Contract creation | ✗ Not available | ✓ Template-based authoring |
Negotiation tools | ✗ Not available | ✓ Real-time collaboration & redlining |
E-signature | ✓ Built-in tool | ✓ Built-in e-signature |
Workflow automation | ✓ Basic workflows | ✓ Advanced custom workflows |
AI capabilities | ✓ Basic AI for search & tagging | ✓ Agreement Intelligence platform |
Analytics | ✓ Basic reporting | ✓ Advanced analytics & insights |
Mobile access | ✓ Mobile-friendly interface | ✓ Native mobile applications |
API access | ✗ Not available | ✓ Robust API ecosystem |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf | .docx, .pdf, .html |
Document editing | ✗ View-only | ✓ Full editing capabilities |
ContractWorks: Contract storage with e-signature
ContractWorks is primarily a contract repository with built-in e-signature:
Secure, centralized document storage
AI-powered search functionality
Automated alerts for key dates
Native e-signature capabilities
Basic reporting and analytics
SOC 2 Type 2 compliance
What it doesn’t do:
Create or edit contracts
Handle negotiations within the platform
Provide document redlining
Offer advanced analytics or insights
Support complex customization
As one ContractWorks user explains in a GetApp review, “It is an affordable software that is easy to access and store documents. We love that it is simple and fulfills our overall goal of storing documents in a meaningful and organized way.”
Concord: Complete contract management
Concord delivers end-to-end contract management software that covers:
Contract creation with templates and clause libraries
Real-time negotiation with comments and tracked changes
Built-in electronic signature (no extra e-signature fees)
Comprehensive approval workflows
Advanced analytics and reporting
Unlimited storage for all agreements
The most significant differentiator? Concord handles the entire contract process in one platform, while ContractWorks focuses primarily on storage, tracking, and e-signatures.
Implementation: How fast can you get started?
Getting contract software up and running is where many companies first feel the pain. Here’s what to expect with these platforms:
Implementation comparison table
Implementation Aspect | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Average setup time | 1-7 days | 1-2 days |
Technical expertise required | Minimal | Moderate |
Implementation process | Guided with support team | Structured with success team guidance |
User training requirements | Minimal (intuitive interface) | Moderate (more features to learn) |
Data migration complexity | Moderate document import | Comprehensive data mapping |
Custom configuration | Limited | Extensive |
Time to first value | Same week | 1-3 days |
Implementation resources | Knowledge base, 24/7 support | Dedicated success managers, training sessions |
ContractWorks touts a relatively quick setup, with most organizations up and running within a week. According to their website on LawNext Directory, ContractWorks offers a “user-friendly interface, short implementation process, and highly rated customer support team.”
Concord balances feature richness with implementation efficiency, typically taking 1-2 days for standard deployments. This approach includes proper workflow setup and integration with existing systems, delivering substantial long-term advantages through better configuration.
The key difference is that while both platforms aim for quick deployment, Concord offers more comprehensive setup services with a dedicated Customer Success Manager, as mentioned on their pricing page.
User experience: Will people actually use it?
Even powerful software fails if nobody wants to use it:
User experience comparison table
UX Aspect | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Interface design | Clean, straightforward | Professional, Gmail-like |
Learning curve | Very low | Low to moderate |
User onboarding | Self-guided with support | Guided with support options |
Mobile experience | Mobile-responsive web interface | Native mobile applications |
Personalization | Limited user preferences | Configurable interfaces by user type |
Accessibility | Standard accessibility features | Enhanced accessibility options |
Interface feedback | “Easy to use” | “Intuitive like Gmail” |
User adoption challenges | Few – Quick adoption typical | Moderate – May require training |
Support resources | Knowledge base, 24/7 support | Interactive guides, dedicated support |
ContractWorks focuses on simplicity with an interface designed for quick adoption. As noted by a reviewer on Capterra, the platform is “user friendly and easy to configure among all the products that we reviewed.”
Concord balances power with usability through a well-designed interface. As one G2 reviewer put it in their review of Concord: “I like that the format is similar to gmail, so it is simple, and intuitive to use.”
The main difference is that while both platforms aim for ease of use, ContractWorks takes a minimalist approach with fewer features to learn, while Concord offers more functionality that might require slightly more training but delivers greater long-term value.
AI capabilities: Basic vs. advanced
AI is transforming contract management in 2025, with significant differences in implementation between these platforms:
AI capabilities comparison table
AI Capability | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Data extraction | ✓ Basic data extraction | ✓ Comprehensive extraction with validation |
OCR technology | ✓ Standard OCR for searchability | ✓ Advanced intelligent document processing |
Risk identification | ✗ Limited | ✓ Automated risk flagging and scoring |
Compliance monitoring | ✗ Not available | ✓ AI-powered compliance checking |
Contract analysis | ✓ Basic term identification | ✓ Deep semantic analysis |
Obligation extraction | ✗ Not available | ✓ Comprehensive obligation management |
Performance analytics | ✗ Not available | ✓ AI-driven performance insights |
Benchmarking | ✗ Not available | ✓ Comparison against industry standards |
Processing speed | Fast (seconds per document) | Fast (seconds per document) |
Accuracy improvement | Moderate | Significant (10%+ over manual review) |
AI training model | General | Industry and customer-specific learning |
ContractWorks uses AI primarily for:
Basic data extraction and identification
Document categorization and tagging
OCR for document searching
Simple deadline tracking
One ContractWorks user mentions on HyperStart that “the AI of the system was top-notch. Contracts are easily accessible,” highlighting its effectiveness for basic organization.
Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform goes much further:
Comprehensive data extraction with validation
Risk identification and flagging
Compliance monitoring
Obligation tracking
Performance analytics and insights
As Matt Lhoumeau, CEO of Concord, explains on the Concord website: “By automating the extraction and entry of key terms, our users can focus on strategic tasks rather than tedious administrative work.”
The efficiency gains are substantial. According to research cited in Concord’s healthcare guide, AI can complete contract reviews in approximately 26 seconds compared to 92 minutes for human reviewers, while achieving 10% higher accuracy.
Integrations: Playing nice with your tech stack
The ability to connect with your existing tools is crucial for any contract solution:
Integration comparison table
Integration Type | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
CRM Systems | ✓ Salesforce (basic) | ✓ Salesforce (bidirectional with advanced workflows) |
E-Signature | ✓ Native e-signature | ✓ Native e-signature |
Cloud Storage | ✗ Limited support | ✓ Google Drive (native) |
Collaboration Tools | ✗ Not available | ✓ Slack (native) |
Identity Management | ✗ Limited | ✓ SAML 2.0, LDAP, Azure AD |
Automation Platform | ✗ Not available | ✓ Zapier (7000+ apps) |
API Access | ✗ No API | ✓ Comprehensive API ecosystem |
Implementation Complexity | Low | Moderate |
ContractWorks offers limited integration options:
Salesforce integration
No API for custom connections
Limited third-party connectivity
According to GetApp, ContractWorks does not have an API available and integrates primarily with Salesforce Platform.
Concord provides a much more extensive contract automation software ecosystem:
Native Salesforce integration with bidirectional data flow
HubSpot integration for marketing and sales alignment
Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, and OneDrive for document storage
Slack integration for real-time notifications
Microsoft Teams connectivity
Zapier connection to 7,000+ apps
Robust API for custom integrations
According to GetApp, Concord integrates with Dropbox Business, DocuSign, Google Drive, Box, Salesforce Sales Cloud, and HubSpot Sales Hub.
The integration landscape heavily favors Concord, which works with over 5,000 applications according to their best contract lifecycle management software page, providing a significant advantage for organizations with complex technology ecosystems.
Pricing: What will it cost?
Both platforms structure their pricing differently, impacting your total cost:
Pricing comparison table
Pricing Aspect | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Pricing model | Tiered based on documents | Flexible based on needs |
Starting price | $700/month | $399/month |
Entry-level plan | Standard: $700/month | Essential: $399/month |
Mid-tier plan | Professional: $900/month | Professional: Custom pricing |
Advanced plan | Enterprise: Custom pricing | Enterprise: Custom pricing |
User limitations | Unlimited users on all plans | Varies by plan |
Contract volume limits | Tiered based on plan | Flexible scaling options |
Additional costs | Limited | May include implementation and training |
Pricing transparency | Clear tiered structure | Custom quotes for many scenarios |
Free trial | Available | Demo available |
Annual commitment | Required | Flexible options |
ContractWorks uses a tiered pricing model with unlimited users:
Standard: $700/month (with one-year commitment)
Professional: $900/month (with one-year commitment)
Enterprise: Custom pricing
According to LawNext Directory, ContractWorks starts at $600/month for unlimited users, though more recent sources like SourceForge indicate pricing now starts at $700/month.
Concord offers more flexible pricing starting at $399/month as stated on their pricing page. Their transparent pricing model includes:
Essential: For small companies or single teams
Professional: For companies deploying across several teams
Enterprise: For larger organizations with complex requirements
All plans include unlimited document uploads, unlimited e-signatures, and no hidden fees. As they note on their pricing page: “Ironic, isn’t it? Companies selling contract management solutions with contracts full of hidden fees and escalating costs. We prefer practicing what we preach.”
For detailed pricing information tailored to your organization, you can explore Concord’s pricing details.
ROI and business impact
Ultimately, the value of any software investment must be measured by its impact on business outcomes:
ROI comparison table
ROI Factor | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Time-to-value | Fast (days to weeks) | Fast (days to weeks) |
Implementation costs | Low | Low to moderate |
Administrative savings | 30-50% reduction in admin time | 40-60% reduction in admin time |
Contract cycle time reduction | Limited impact (storage focus) | 40-75% reduction in cycle time |
Renewal opportunity capture | High – Automated alerts | Very high – Proactive management |
Risk mitigation value | Moderate | High |
Revenue impact | Indirect – Cost savings focus | Direct – Revenue acceleration |
Compliance benefits | Basic compliance improvements | Comprehensive compliance transformation |
Strategic insights | Limited | Extensive |
Typical ROI timeframe | 3-6 months | 3-6 months |
ROI multiplier | Moderate | High (91-183x per dollar invested) |
ContractWorks delivers value primarily through:
Centralized contract storage
Improved visibility into contract terms
Automated deadline tracking
Streamlined e-signature process
SOC 2 Type 2 compliance
A ContractWorks user notes on Capterra that “The most compelling part of the platform is being able to generate reports that indicate which contracts/docs are due to expire within a specific time,” highlighting its effectiveness for deadline management.
Concord delivers more comprehensive returns through:
Full lifecycle efficiency improvements
Accelerated contract creation and approval
Streamlined negotiation and execution
Reduced legal review requirements
Strategic insights from contract analytics
According to Concord’s research shared on their procurement software page, “For every dollar invested in contract management software, companies can expect to generate between $91 and $183 in recovered revenue.”
Industry research shows that organizations implementing CLM software typically aim for a minimum 3:1 benefit-to-cost ratio, or a 300% ROI, according to Concord’s procurement guide.
Market position and future outlook
Both companies occupy distinct positions in the contract management software market:
Market position comparison
Market Aspect | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Market focus | Simple contract repository | Complete contract lifecycle management |
Target company size | SMB to mid-market | SMB through enterprise |
Industry strength | General use with focus on compliance | Cross-industry with specialized solutions |
Growth trajectory | Steady | Rapid |
Key competitors | Concord, ContractSafe, LinkSquares | DocuSign CLM, SAP Ariba, Deltek |
AI development | Moderate | Advanced |
Market perception | Simple, reliable | Innovative, comprehensive |
Future development | Incremental improvements | Expanding AI and integration capabilities |
According to research from Mordor Intelligence, Concord is among the major companies operating in the contract lifecycle management software market, alongside ContractWorks, Zycus, Contract Logix, and GEP.
With the global contract lifecycle management market projected to grow significantly (from $1.49 billion in 2025 to $2.66 billion by 2030), both companies are well-positioned to capture market share, but with different approaches and target segments.
Security and compliance
For sensitive contract data, security is paramount:
Security comparison table
Security Feature | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Data encryption | ✓ At rest and in transit | ✓ At rest and in transit |
Access controls | ✓ Role-based permissions | ✓ Advanced role and team permissions |
Compliance certifications | ✓ SOC 2 Type 2 | ✓ SOC 2, GDPR compliance |
Audit trails | ✓ Basic activity logging | ✓ Comprehensive audit trails |
Security testing | ✓ Regular security audits | ✓ Penetration testing and security audits |
Uptime guarantee | ✓ High availability | ✓ 99.9% uptime guarantee |
Data recovery | ✓ Standard backup procedures | ✓ Advanced disaster recovery |
Single sign-on | ✗ Limited | ✓ SAML 2.0, LDAP, Azure AD |
ContractWorks offers solid security fundamentals:
SOC 2 Type 2 compliance
Secure document storage
Role-based access controls
Audit trails for document activity
According to Capterra, ContractWorks offers a “centralized repository, allowing users to store and organize contracts securely with SOC 2 Type 2 compliance.”
Concord provides comprehensive security and compliance features:
Advanced access controls with custom roles and teams
Complete audit trails for all activities
SAML 2.0, LDAP, and Azure AD integration
SOC 2 compliant infrastructure
GDPR compliance for global operations
As mentioned on GetApp, Concord offers “state-of-the-art security features, compliant with the strictest international and industry-specific standards, data-loss prevention, and a monthly uptime of at least 99.9%.”
Which one is right for you?
The best contract lifecycle management software depends on your specific needs:
Overall comparison: At-a-glance decision matrix
Factor | ContractWorks | Concord |
---|---|---|
Best suited for | • Organizations needing contract storage and e-signatures | • Full lifecycle contract management needs |
Implementation time | 1-7 days | 1-2 days |
Pricing model | Tiered with unlimited users | Flexible with options for all sizes |
Starting price | $700/month | $399/month |
User experience | Very simple, minimal learning curve | Intuitive but with more features to master |
AI capabilities | Basic AI for search and tracking | Comprehensive Agreement Intelligence platform |
Integration breadth | Limited (primarily Salesforce) | Extensive integration ecosystem (5000+ apps) |
Customization | Limited | Extensive |
API availability | No API | Comprehensive API ecosystem |
Mobile support | Mobile-friendly interface | Native mobile applications |
Customer support | 24/7 support | Dedicated success managers for higher tiers |
ROI timeline | 3-6 months | 3-6 months |
Choose ContractWorks if:
You primarily need contract storage and e-signature
You value extreme simplicity over advanced features
Your processes don’t require complex workflows
You want unlimited users at a fixed price point
You don’t need advanced integrations or API access
Choose Concord if:
You need end-to-end contract lifecycle management
You want to eliminate separate e-signature costs
Your teams collaborate extensively on contracts
You require advanced analytics and insights
You need robust integrations with your tech stack
You want AI-powered insights from your contracts
Most growing organizations find that Concord delivers significantly more value at a lower starting price point, with greater flexibility for scaling as needs evolve.
Want to see Concord in action? Request a demo tailored to your specific use cases and requirements.
Frequently asked questions about Concord vs. ContractWorks
Bibliography
Thousands of companies trust Concord
VP OF LEGAL View all testimonials