Feature | Concord | ContractSafe |
---|---|---|
Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
Approval workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
Audit trails | ✓ | ✓ |
Internal/public discussion | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrations with Salesforce, DocuSign, Google Drive, Box, and Dropbox | ✓ | ✓ |
Open API | ✓ | ✓ |
Unlimited storage | ✓ | ✗ |
Universal easy-to-learn interface | ✓ | ✗ |
Generate and send multiple contracts at once | ✓ | ✗ |
Clause library | ✓ | ✗ |
Edit in-app | ✓ | ✗ |
Native e-signature | ✓ | ✗ |
Transparent pricing | ✓ | ✗ |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf, .html | .docx |
Implementation time | 1-2 days | 30 min – 2 hours |
Starting price | $399/month | $375/month |
Features: What can they actually do?
ContractSafe and Concord serve different contract management needs:
Feature comparison table
Feature | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
Contract repository | ✓ Secure, centralized storage | ✓ Secure, centralized storage |
Document search | ✓ AI-powered full-text search | ✓ Advanced search with filtering |
OCR technology | ✓ Automatic for all documents | ✓ Intelligent document processing |
Email alerts | ✓ Customizable notifications | ✓ Comprehensive alert system |
Contract creation | ✗ Not available | ✓ Template-based authoring |
Negotiation tools | ✗ Not available | ✓ Real-time collaboration & redlining |
E-signature | ✗ Third-party integration only | ✓ Built-in e-signature |
Workflow automation | ✓ Basic workflows | ✓ Advanced custom workflows |
AI capabilities | ✓ Data extraction & tagging | ✓ Agreement Intelligence platform |
Analytics | ✓ Basic reporting | ✓ Advanced analytics & insights |
Mobile access | ✓ Mobile-friendly interface | ✓ Native mobile applications |
API access | ✓ Available | ✓ Robust API ecosystem |
File formats supported | .docx | .docx, .pdf, .html |
ContractSafe: The basic organizer
ContractSafe is essentially a contract filing cabinet with:
Simple document storage and organization
Basic search functionality
Automated reminders for key dates
Limited third-party integrations
Simple permission controls
What it doesn’t do:
Create or edit contracts
Handle negotiations within the platform
Provide native e-signature
Offer advanced reporting or analytics
Support complex workflows
As one ContractSafe user explains in a Capterra review, “Simple, straightforward, effective contract management without all the unnecessary bells and whistles that only confuse users and deter them from using it.”
Concord: Complete contract management
Concord delivers end-to-end contract management software that covers:
Contract creation with templates and clause libraries
Real-time negotiation with comments and tracked changes
Built-in electronic signature (no extra DocuSign fees)
Comprehensive approval workflows
Advanced analytics and reporting
The most significant differentiator? Concord handles the entire contract process in one platform, while ContractSafe focuses solely on storage and tracking.
Implementation: How fast can you get started?
Getting contract software up and running is where many companies first feel the pain. Here’s what to expect with these platforms:
Implementation comparison table
Implementation Aspect | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
Average setup time | 30 minutes – 2 hours | 1-2 days |
Technical expertise required | Minimal | Moderate |
Implementation process | Self-guided with optional support | Structured with success team guidance |
User training requirements | Minimal (intuitive interface) | Moderate (more features to learn) |
Data migration complexity | Basic document import | Comprehensive data mapping |
Custom configuration | Limited | Extensive |
Time to first value | Same day | 1-3 days |
Implementation resources | Knowledge base, email support | Dedicated success managers, training sessions |
ContractSafe focuses on quick setup, typically taking 30 minutes to 2 hours. You can import your contracts and start tracking them the same day. One customer even noted on ContractSafe’s website, “I couldn’t believe we were already up and running in just 30 mins.”
Concord strikes a balance with a 1-2 day implementation that includes proper workflow setup and integration with your existing systems. This slightly longer timeline delivers substantial long-term advantages through better configuration.
The right choice depends on your timeline and complexity needs. If you want immediate organization, ContractSafe works. But Concord’s modest implementation time gives you full contract lifecycle management without lengthy deployment headaches.
User experience: Will people actually use it?
Even powerful software fails if nobody wants to use it:
User experience comparison table
UX Aspect | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
Interface design | Clean, minimal | Professional, feature-rich |
Learning curve | Very low | Low to moderate |
User onboarding | Self-guided | Guided with support options |
Mobile experience | Mobile-responsive web interface | Native mobile applications |
Personalization | Limited user preferences | Configurable interfaces by user type |
Accessibility | Standard accessibility features | Enhanced accessibility options |
Interface feedback | “Simple and straightforward” | “Intuitive like Gmail” |
User adoption challenges | Few – Quick adoption typical | Moderate – May require training |
Support resources | Knowledge base, email support | Interactive guides, dedicated support |
ContractSafe aims for simplicity with a clean, no-frills interface. Users can find what they need quickly, but functions are limited to basic organization and searching.
As one reviewer stated on Capterra, “The UX is very good. ContractSafe was easy to set up and customize, even for lawyers.”
Concord balances power with usability through:
An interface that “feels like Gmail” according to users
Intuitive navigation despite deeper functionality
Mobile apps for on-the-go contract management
Contextual help that guides users through processes
As one G2 reviewer put it in their review of Concord: “I like that the format is similar to gmail, so it is simple, and intuitive to use.”
AI capabilities: Smart vs. smarter
AI is transforming contract management in 2025, but implementation varies dramatically:
AI capabilities comparison table
AI Capability | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
Data extraction | ✓ Basic data extraction | ✓ Comprehensive extraction with validation |
OCR technology | ✓ Standard OCR for searchability | ✓ Advanced intelligent document processing |
Risk identification | ✗ Limited | ✓ Automated risk flagging and scoring |
Compliance monitoring | ✗ Not available | ✓ AI-powered compliance checking |
Contract analysis | ✓ Basic term identification | ✓ Deep semantic analysis |
Obligation extraction | ✗ Limited | ✓ Comprehensive obligation management |
Performance analytics | ✗ Not available | ✓ AI-driven performance insights |
Benchmarking | ✗ Not available | ✓ Comparison against industry standards |
Processing speed | Fast (seconds per document) | Fast (seconds per document) |
Accuracy improvement | Moderate | Significant (10%+ over manual review) |
AI training model | General | Industry and customer-specific learning |
ContractSafe uses AI primarily for:
Basic data extraction (dates, parties)
Document categorization
Simple OCR for document searching
A ContractSafe reviewer notes on Capterra, “While the AI is limited, it does provide essential functionality for document organization.”
Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform goes much further:
Comprehensive data extraction with validation
Risk identification and flagging
Compliance monitoring
Obligation tracking
Performance analytics and insights
As Matt Lhoumeau, CEO of Concord, explains on the Concord website: “By automating the extraction and entry of key terms, our users can focus on strategic tasks rather than tedious administrative work.”
The efficiency gains are substantial. According to research cited in Concord’s healthcare guide, AI can complete contract reviews in approximately 26 seconds compared to 92 minutes for human reviewers, while achieving 10% higher accuracy.
Integrations: Playing nice with your tech stack
The ability to connect with your existing tools is crucial for any contract solution:
Integration comparison table
Integration Type | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
CRM Systems | ✓ Salesforce (basic push) | ✓ Salesforce (bidirectional with advanced workflows) |
E-Signature | ✓ DocuSign (one-way and two-way) | ✓ Native e-signature (no third-party needed) |
Cloud Storage | ✓ Basic cloud storage connections | ✓ Google Drive (native) |
Collaboration Tools | ✗ Limited support | ✓ Slack (native) |
Identity Management | ✓ SAML 2.0/Okta | ✓ SAML 2.0, LDAP, Azure AD |
Automation Platform | ✓ Zapier (2000+ apps) | ✓ Zapier (7000+ apps) |
API Access | ✓ Basic API | ✓ Comprehensive API ecosystem |
Implementation Complexity | Low – Moderate | Moderate – High |
ContractSafe offers basic integrations including:
DocuSign for e-signatures
Salesforce for CRM connection
SAML 2.0/Okta for single sign-on
Zapier for connecting to ~2,000 apps
Basic API access
Concord provides a much more extensive contract automation software ecosystem:
Native Salesforce integration with bidirectional data flow
HubSpot integration for marketing and sales alignment
Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, and OneDrive for document storage
Slack integration for real-time notifications
Microsoft Teams connectivity
Zapier connection to 7,000+ apps
Robust API for custom integrations
According to market intelligence from 6sense, Concord has captured a 14.23% market share in the contract management space, making it a leading player in the industry.
For teams with complex tech stacks, Concord’s integration capabilities create a more seamless workflow across systems.
Pricing: What will it cost?
Both platforms structure their pricing differently, impacting your total cost:
Pricing comparison table
Pricing Aspect | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
Pricing model | Contract-based with unlimited users | Flexible based on contract volume, users, and features |
Starting price | $375/month | $399/month |
Entry-level plan | Organize: $375/month (up to 500 contracts) | Essential: $399/month |
Mid-tier plan | Finalize: $579/month (up to 1,000 contracts) | Professional: Custom pricing |
Advanced plan | Maximize: $746/month (up to 2,500 contracts) | Enterprise: Custom pricing |
User limitations | Unlimited users on all plans | Varies by plan |
Contract volume limits | Tiered based on plan | Flexible scaling options |
Additional costs | Limited | May include implementation and training |
Pricing transparency | Clear tiered structure | Custom quotes for many scenarios |
Free trial | Available | Demo available |
Annual discount | Available | Available |
ContractSafe uses contract-volume pricing with unlimited users:
Organize: $375/month (up to 500 contracts)
Finalize: $579/month (up to 1,000 contracts)
Maximize: $746/month (up to 2,500 contracts)
This model works well if you have many stakeholders but relatively few contracts.
Concord starts at $399/month with a flexible structure based on your specific needs. All plans include unlimited e-signatures and document storage, with features that scale as you grow.
For detailed pricing information tailored to your organization, you can explore Concord’s pricing details.
ROI and business impact
Ultimately, the value of any software investment must be measured by its impact on business outcomes:
ROI comparison table
ROI Factor | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
Time-to-value | Very fast (hours to days) | Fast (days to weeks) |
Implementation costs | Low | Low to moderate |
Administrative savings | 30-50% reduction in admin time | 40-60% reduction in admin time |
Contract cycle time reduction | Limited impact (storage focus) | 40-75% reduction in cycle time |
Renewal opportunity capture | High – Automated alerts | Very high – Proactive management |
Risk mitigation value | Moderate | High |
Revenue impact | Indirect – Cost savings focus | Direct – Revenue acceleration |
Compliance benefits | Basic compliance improvements | Comprehensive compliance transformation |
Strategic insights | Limited | Extensive |
Typical ROI timeframe | 1-3 months | 3-6 months |
ROI multiplier | Moderate | High (91-183x per dollar invested) |
ContractSafe delivers value primarily through:
Rapid time-to-value due to quick implementation
Reduced administrative overhead
Prevention of missed renewal dates
Improved contract accessibility
Simplified compliance management
One user explained on Software Advice, “Before using ContractSafe, I would miss contract expiration dates and get trapped into another contract through auto renewal.”
Concord delivers more comprehensive returns through:
Full lifecycle efficiency improvements
Accelerated contract creation and approval
Streamlined negotiation and execution
Reduced legal review requirements
Strategic insights from contract analytics
According to Concord’s research shared on their procurement software page, “For every dollar invested in contract management software, companies can expect to generate between $91 and $183 in recovered revenue.”
Industry research shows that organizations implementing CLM software typically aim for a minimum 3:1 benefit-to-cost ratio, or a 300% ROI, according to Concord’s procurement guide.
Market position and future growth
The contract management software market is experiencing significant growth, with some important trends to note:
Market position comparison
Market Aspect | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
Market share | Moderate | 14.23% (leading position) |
Customer base | Diverse, emphasis on SMBs | 1,368+ companies (87% in US) |
Industry focus | Broad with strength in education | Cross-industry with specialized solutions |
Target company size | SMB to mid-market | SMB through enterprise |
Geographic strength | US-focused | Global presence with US dominance |
Growth trajectory | Steady | Rapid |
Key competitors | Concord, ContractWorks, LinkSquares | DocuSign CLM, SAP Ariba, Deltek |
AI development | Moderate | Advanced |
Market perception | Reliable, easy-to-use | Innovative, comprehensive |
According to research from Mordor Intelligence, Concord is among the major companies operating in the contract lifecycle management software market, alongside ContractWorks, Zycus, Contract Logix, and GEP.
The global contract lifecycle management market is projected to grow significantly, with various analyst firms providing strong forecasts:
From $1.49 billion in 2025 to $2.66 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 12.25% according to Mordor Intelligence
Expected to reach $3.46 billion by 2034, with a CAGR of 12.4% from 2024, as reported on Concord’s guide to contract management software
Healthcare CLM specifically projected to reach $9.68 billion by 2032 according to Data Bridge Market Research, cited in Concord’s healthcare guide
According to Gartner’s analysis, “half of procurement contract management will be AI-enabled by 2027,” highlighting the increasing importance of advanced AI capabilities like those offered by Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform.
Which one is right for you?
The best contract lifecycle management software depends on your specific needs:
Overall comparison: At-a-glance decision matrix
Factor | ContractSafe | Concord |
---|---|---|
Best suited for | • Organizations needing simple contract storage and tracking | • Full lifecycle contract management needs |
Implementation time | 30 minutes – 2 hours | 1-2 days |
Pricing model | Contract-based with unlimited users | Flexible with options for contract volume, users, and features |
Starting price | $375/month | $399/month |
User experience | Very simple, minimal learning curve | Intuitive but with more features to master |
AI capabilities | Basic data extraction and tagging | Comprehensive Agreement Intelligence platform |
Integration breadth | Limited core integrations | Extensive integration ecosystem (5000+ apps) |
Customization | Limited | Extensive |
Mobile support | Mobile-friendly interface | Native mobile applications |
Customer support | Standard support channels | Dedicated success managers for higher tiers |
ROI timeline | Quick wins for basic organization | Deeper long-term value across contract lifecycle |
Choose ContractSafe if:
You only need basic contract storage and tracking
Implementation speed is your top priority
You have a limited budget for a large number of contracts
Your contract processes are simple
You don’t need integrated e-signature or contract creation
Choose Concord if:
You need end-to-end contract lifecycle management
You want to eliminate separate e-signature costs
Your teams collaborate extensively on contracts
You require advanced analytics and reporting
You need robust integrations with your tech stack
You want AI-powered insights from your contracts
Most growing organizations find that Concord delivers significantly more value without the implementation complexity and cost of traditional enterprise CLM platforms.
Want to see Concord in action? Request a demo tailored to your specific use cases and requirements.
Frequently asked questions about ContractSafe vs. Concord
Bibliography
6sense: Concord – Market Share, Competitor Insights in Contract Management
Mordor Intelligence: Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market Growth Trends
Future Market Insights: Contract Lifecycle Management Market Forecast 2025 to 2035
Software Testing Help: The Top 14 Contract Management Software Ranked for 2025
SignWell: Here Are Our 5 Favorite Contract Lifecycle Management Software
A5Corp: CLM Trends 2024: Future Insights for Contract Management
Thousands of companies trust Concord
VP OF LEGAL View all testimonials
Need to know