Feature | Concord | Outlaw |
---|---|---|
Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
Approval workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
Audit trails | ✓ | ✓ |
Internal/public discussion | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrations with Salesforce, DocuSign, Google Drive, Box, and Dropbox | ✓ | ✓ |
Open API | ✓ | ✗ |
Unlimited storage | ✓ | ✓ |
Universal easy-to-learn interface | ✓ | ✗ |
Generate and send multiple contracts at once | ✓ | ✓ |
Clause library | ✓ | ✓ |
Edit in-app | ✓ | ✓ |
Native e-signature | ✓ | ✓ |
Transparent pricing | ✓ | ✗ |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf, .html | .docx, .pdf |
Implementation time | Less than 1 day | 1-2 weeks |
Starting price | $399/month | $100/month per user |
Features: What can they actually do?
Concord and Outlaw offer different approaches to contract management, each with distinct strengths:
Feature comparison table
Feature | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
Contract repository | ✓ Secure, centralized storage | ✓ Secure, centralized storage |
Document search | ✓ AI-powered full-text search | ✓ Advanced search with filtering |
OCR technology | ✓ Standard OCR for documents | ✓ Intelligent document processing |
Email alerts | ✓ Basic notifications | ✓ Comprehensive alert system |
Contract creation | ✓ Strong template-based authoring | ✓ Template-based authoring |
Negotiation tools | ✓ Real-time collaboration & redlining | ✓ Real-time collaboration & redlining |
E-signature | ✓ Built-in e-signature | ✓ Built-in e-signature |
Workflow automation | ✓ Basic workflows | ✓ Advanced custom workflows |
AI capabilities | ✓ Basic data extraction | ✓ Agreement Intelligence platform |
Analytics | ✓ Basic reporting | ✓ Advanced analytics & insights |
Mobile access | ✓ Mobile apps available | ✓ Native mobile applications |
API access | ✗ No API available | ✓ Robust API ecosystem |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf | .docx, .pdf, .html |
Outlaw: The negotiation specialist
Outlaw is a modern contract platform focused on streamlining contract creation and negotiation with:
Strong document generation capabilities
Dynamic templates with conditional logic
Real-time collaboration and redlining
Mobile e-signature functionality
Plain English overview layer for contracts
Secure document repository
What it doesn’t do as well:
Provide advanced analytics and insights
Offer comprehensive API access
Connect to as many third-party applications
Support advanced workflow automation
As one Outlaw user explains on Capterra: “Laser focus on the aspects of the product matters – drafting, variables and sharing. Rapid development and responsive support team.”
Concord: Complete contract management
Concord delivers end-to-end contract management software that covers:
Contract creation with templates and clause libraries
Real-time negotiation with comments and tracked changes
Built-in electronic signature (no extra DocuSign fees)
Comprehensive approval workflows
Advanced analytics and reporting
AI-powered Agreement Intelligence
The most significant differentiator? Concord offers a more complete solution with stronger integrations, analytics, and AI capabilities, while Outlaw specializes in contract creation and negotiation.
Implementation: How fast can you get started?
Getting contract software up and running is where many companies first feel the pain. Here’s what to expect with these platforms:
Implementation comparison table
Implementation Aspect | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
Average setup time | 1-2 weeks | Less than 1 day |
Technical expertise required | Moderate | Minimal |
Implementation process | Structured with custom setup | Self-guided with optional support |
User training requirements | Moderate (multiple sessions) | Low to moderate |
Data migration complexity | Moderate to high | Low to moderate |
Custom configuration | Extensive but complex | Extensive yet intuitive |
Time to first value | 1-2 weeks | Same day |
Implementation resources | Dedicated team, multiple sessions | Success team, streamlined process |
Outlaw requires a more traditional implementation approach, typically taking 1-2 weeks to fully configure. While their customer success team provides strong support, the process involves multiple setup sessions and significant configuration work.
A user on Software Advice notes: “My overall experience has been good. [Customer Success] was very helpful in getting our templates set up and always very friendly.”
Concord offers remarkably fast implementation, with most customers up and running in less than a day. This streamlined approach focuses on quickly establishing your contract workflows and integrations through an intuitive setup process.
For organizations seeking rapid deployment, Concord’s implementation time provides a significant advantage over Outlaw’s more traditional approach.
User experience: Will people actually use it?
Even powerful software fails if nobody wants to use it:
User experience comparison table
UX Aspect | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
Interface design | Modern but complex | Clean, Gmail-like interface |
Learning curve | Moderate | Low to moderate |
User onboarding | Guided with multiple sessions | Self-guided with support |
Mobile experience | Mobile apps available | Native mobile applications |
Personalization | Template customization focus | Configurable workflows and interfaces |
Accessibility | Standard features | Enhanced accessibility options |
Interface feedback | “Intuitive contract creation” | “Simple like Gmail” |
User adoption challenges | Moderate – Required training | Low – Intuitive adoption |
Support resources | Strong customer success team | Interactive guides, dedicated support |
Outlaw offers a modern interface with a focus on contract creation and negotiation. Users generally find the platform easy to navigate once they’ve been properly trained, but there is a learning curve.
A reviewer on G2 states: “The interface is super simple and very easy for a non lawyer to navigate. Our clients don’t want to read through 20 pages of legalese paperwork, they want to sign paper and get to work.”
Concord provides an intuitive interface that feels familiar to users, reducing the learning curve and accelerating adoption. The Gmail-like experience makes it easy for non-technical users to get started quickly.
As one user explains in their G2 review: “I like that the format is similar to gmail, so it is simple, and intuitive to use.”
AI capabilities: Smart vs. smarter
AI is transforming contract management in 2025, but implementation varies dramatically between platforms:
AI capabilities comparison table
AI Capability | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
Data extraction | ✓ Basic data extraction | ✓ Comprehensive extraction with validation |
OCR technology | ✓ Standard OCR | ✓ Advanced intelligent document processing |
Risk identification | ✗ Limited | ✓ Automated risk flagging and scoring |
Compliance monitoring | ✗ Not available | ✓ AI-powered compliance checking |
Contract analysis | ✓ Basic term identification | ✓ Deep semantic analysis |
Obligation extraction | ✗ Limited | ✓ Comprehensive obligation management |
Performance analytics | ✗ Not available | ✓ AI-driven performance insights |
Benchmarking | ✗ Not available | ✓ Comparison against industry standards |
Processing speed | Fast (seconds per document) | Fast (seconds per document) |
Accuracy improvement | Moderate | Significant (10%+ over manual review) |
AI training model | General | Industry and customer-specific learning |
Outlaw has made strides with basic AI capabilities, particularly for template creation and initial data extraction. Their AI features are primarily focused on the beginning of the contract lifecycle.
Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform offers a more comprehensive AI approach, including:
Comprehensive data extraction with validation
Risk identification and flagging
Compliance monitoring
Obligation tracking
Performance analytics and insights
As Matt Lhoumeau, CEO of Concord, explains on the Concord website: “By automating the extraction and entry of key terms, our users can focus on strategic tasks rather than tedious administrative work.”
The efficiency gains are substantial. According to research cited in Concord’s healthcare guide, AI can complete contract reviews in approximately 26 seconds compared to 92 minutes for human reviewers, while achieving 10% higher accuracy.
Integrations: Playing nice with your tech stack
The ability to connect with your existing tools is crucial for any contract solution:
Integration comparison table
Integration Type | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
CRM Systems | ✓ Salesforce (basic) | ✓ Salesforce (bidirectional with advanced workflows) |
E-Signature | ✓ Native e-signature | ✓ Native e-signature (no third-party needed) |
Cloud Storage | ✓ Box (native) | ✓ Google Drive (native) |
Collaboration Tools | ✓ Slack (via Zapier) | ✓ Slack (native) |
Identity Management | ✓ Basic SSO | ✓ SAML 2.0, LDAP, Azure AD |
Automation Platform | ✓ Zapier | ✓ Zapier (7000+ apps) |
API Access | ✗ No API available | ✓ Comprehensive API ecosystem |
Implementation Complexity | Moderate – High | Low – Moderate |
Outlaw offers a reasonable set of integrations, focusing primarily on Salesforce, Box, and Zapier connections. However, many users note the limitations in integration capabilities.
As one user points out on GetApp: “No native integration with Hubspot and limited functionality through Zapier. Depending on how you use it, there may still be a need for manual data entry/creating documents from scratch.”
Concord provides a much more extensive contract automation software ecosystem:
Native Salesforce integration with bidirectional data flow
HubSpot integration for marketing and sales alignment
Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, and OneDrive for document storage
Slack integration for real-time notifications
Microsoft Teams connectivity
Zapier connection to 7,000+ apps
Robust API for custom integrations
According to Concord’s procurement contract management guide, integration with existing systems is critical for maximizing the value of contract management: “Modern solutions offer API-based integration with ERP systems, CRM platforms, procurement systems, e-signature tools, and business intelligence platforms, creating a seamless flow of data across the organization.”
Pricing: What will it cost?
Both platforms structure their pricing differently, impacting your total cost:
Pricing comparison table
Pricing Aspect | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
Pricing model | User-based | Flexible based on contract volume, users, and features |
Starting price | $100/month per user | $399/month |
Entry-level plan | $100/month per user | Essential: $399/month |
Mid-tier plan | Custom pricing | Professional: Custom pricing |
Advanced plan | Custom pricing | Enterprise: Custom pricing |
User limitations | Pay per user | Varies by plan |
Contract volume limits | Unlimited | Flexible scaling options |
Additional costs | Implementation and training | Minimal additional costs |
Pricing transparency | Limited | Clear structure |
Free trial | Available | No longer available as of 2025 |
Annual discount | Available | Available |
Outlaw uses a user-based pricing model, starting at $100/month per user according to Software Suggest. This can work well for small teams but becomes more expensive as your organization scales. Custom pricing is available for larger deployments, but details aren’t publicly available.
Concord starts at $399/month with a flexible structure based on your specific needs. According to Concord’s pricing page, all plans include unlimited e-signatures and document storage, with features that scale as you grow.
For detailed pricing information tailored to your organization, you can explore Concord’s pricing details.
ROI and business impact
Ultimately, the value of any software investment must be measured by its impact on business outcomes:
ROI comparison table
ROI Factor | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
Time-to-value | 1-2 weeks | Less than 1 day |
Implementation costs | Moderate | Low |
Administrative savings | 25-40% reduction in admin time | 40-60% reduction in admin time |
Contract cycle time reduction | 30-60% reduction | 40-75% reduction in cycle time |
Renewal opportunity capture | Good – Automated alerts | Very high – Proactive management |
Risk mitigation value | Moderate | High |
Revenue impact | Indirect – Focus on closing deals | Direct – Revenue acceleration |
Compliance benefits | Basic compliance improvements | Comprehensive compliance transformation |
Strategic insights | Limited | Extensive |
Typical ROI timeframe | 2-4 months | 1-3 months |
ROI multiplier | Moderate | High (91-183x per dollar invested) |
Outlaw delivers value primarily through:
Improved contract creation
Streamlined negotiation processes
Mobile e-signature capabilities
Better document organization
Secure document storage
One user on Software Advice explains: “There were two things that we particularly loved about Outlaw: their intuitive contract creation process as well as the Overview function that allowed us to cut through the dense legal contracts.”
Concord delivers more comprehensive returns through:
Full lifecycle efficiency improvements
Accelerated contract creation and approval
Streamlined negotiation and execution
Reduced legal review requirements
Strategic insights from contract analytics
According to Concord’s research shared on their procurement software page, “For every dollar invested in contract management software, companies can expect to generate between $91 and $183 in recovered revenue.”
Industry research shows that organizations implementing CLM software typically aim for a minimum 3:1 benefit-to-cost ratio, or a 300% ROI, according to Concord’s procurement guide.
Market position and future growth
The contract management software market is experiencing significant growth, with some important trends to note:
Market position comparison
Market Aspect | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
Market share | Growing | 14.23% (leading position) |
Customer base | Diverse, emphasis on mid-market | 1,368+ companies (87% in US) |
Industry focus | Cross-industry | Cross-industry with specialized solutions |
Target company size | SMB to mid-market | SMB through enterprise |
Geographic strength | US-focused | Global presence with US dominance |
Growth trajectory | Steady | Rapid |
Key competitors | Concord, ContractWorks, DocuSign CLM | DocuSign CLM, SAP Ariba, Deltek |
AI development | Moderate | Advanced |
Market perception | Modern, user-friendly | Innovative, comprehensive |
According to research from Mordor Intelligence, Concord is among the major companies operating in the contract lifecycle management software market, alongside ContractWorks, Zycus, Contract Logix, and GEP.
The global contract lifecycle management market is projected to grow significantly, with various analyst firms providing strong forecasts:
From $1.49 billion in 2025 to $2.66 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 12.25% according to Mordor Intelligence
Expected to reach $3.46 billion by 2034, with a CAGR of 12.4% from 2024, as reported on Concord’s guide to contract management software
Healthcare CLM specifically projected to reach $9.68 billion by 2032 according to Data Bridge Market Research, cited in Concord’s healthcare guide
According to Gartner’s analysis, “half of procurement contract management will be AI-enabled by 2027,” highlighting the increasing importance of advanced AI capabilities like those offered by Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform.
Which one is right for you?
The best contract lifecycle management software depends on your specific needs:
Overall comparison: At-a-glance decision matrix
Factor | Outlaw | Concord |
---|---|---|
Best suited for | • Organizations focused on contract creation and negotiation | • Full lifecycle contract management needs |
Implementation time | 1-2 weeks | Less than 1 day |
Pricing model | User-based | Flexible with options for contract volume, users, and features |
Starting price | $100/month per user | $399/month |
User experience | Modern but requires training | Intuitive, Gmail-like interface |
AI capabilities | Basic contract creation focused | Comprehensive Agreement Intelligence platform |
Integration breadth | Limited core integrations | Extensive integration ecosystem (5000+ apps) |
Customization | Strong template customization | Extensive platform customization |
Mobile support | Mobile apps available | Native mobile applications |
Customer support | Strong success team | Dedicated success managers for higher tiers |
ROI timeline | 2-4 months | 1-3 months |
Choose Outlaw if:
Your primary focus is contract creation and negotiation
You need strong template customization capabilities
Your contract process is relatively straightforward
You have a small team where per-user pricing makes sense
You prioritize a modern contract generation experience
Choose Concord if:
You need end-to-end contract lifecycle management
You want to eliminate separate e-signature costs
Your teams collaborate extensively on contracts
You require advanced analytics and reporting
You need robust integrations with your tech stack
You want AI-powered insights from your contracts
You need to be up and running quickly (in less than a day)
Most growing organizations find that Concord delivers significantly more value without the implementation complexity and cost of traditional enterprise CLM platforms.
Want to see Concord in action? Request a demo tailored to your specific use cases and requirements.
Frequently asked questions about Concord vs. Outlaw
Bibliography
Thousands of companies trust Concord
VP OF LEGAL View all testimonials