The bottom line
Evisort offers an AI-focused contract management solution primarily designed for enterprise legal departments with significant technical resources.
Concord delivers complete contract lifecycle management with advanced features that won’t overwhelm your team:
- Set up in as little as a day (compared to 30+ days for many AI-focused platforms)
- Intuitive interface that feels like using Gmail
- Built-in e-signature at no additional cost
- Agreement Intelligence that extracts key contract data automatically
For organizations seeking a powerful contract solution that balances advanced capabilities with rapid implementation and ease of use, Concord provides the ideal combination of functionality and accessibility.
How they stack up: Concord vs. Evisort
Feature | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
Approval workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
Audit trails | ✓ | ✓ |
Internal/public discussion | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrations with Salesforce, Google Drive, Box, and Dropbox | ✓ | ✓ |
Open API | ✓ | ✓ |
Market share (contract management) | 14.23% | 0.31% |
Unlimited storage | ✓ | ✗ |
Universal easy-to-learn interface | ✓ | ✗ |
Generate and send multiple contracts at once | ✓ | ✓ |
E-signature | Native (included) | Limited |
Transparent pricing | ✓ | ✗ |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf, .html | .docx, .pdf |
Implementation time | 1-2 days | 30+ days |
Starting price | $399/month | Custom pricing (contact sales) |
Features: What can they actually do?
Concord and Evisort serve different contract management needs:
Feature comparison table
Feature | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Contract repository | ✓ Secure, centralized storage with unlimited capacity | ✓ Secure, centralized storage with volume limits |
Document search | ✓ Intuitive search with user-friendly filtering | ✓ Advanced AI search requiring technical setup |
OCR technology | ✓ Intelligent document processing | ✓ Advanced OCR with limitations on low-quality documents |
Email alerts | ✓ Comprehensive alert system | ✓ Basic notification system with limited customization |
Contract creation | ✓ Intuitive template-based authoring | ✓ Template-based authoring with technical setup |
Negotiation tools | ✓ Real-time collaboration & redlining | ✓ Limited real-time collaboration |
E-signature | ✓ Built-in e-signature at no additional cost | ✓ Limited e-signature capabilities |
Workflow automation | ✓ User-friendly custom workflows | ✓ Complex workflow configuration |
AI capabilities | ✓ Agreement Intelligence platform | ✓ Machine Learning with advanced training requirements |
Analytics | ✓ Advanced analytics & actionable insights | ✓ Limited customizable reporting |
Mobile access | ✓ Intuitive mobile applications | ✓ Limited mobile functionality |
API access | ✓ Developer-friendly API ecosystem | ✓ Complex API requiring technical expertise |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf, .html | .docx, .pdf |
Evisort: The AI specialization approach
Evisort focuses heavily on artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities for contract analysis:
- Advanced document processing and data extraction
- Strong OCR capabilities for automated analysis
- AI-trained models for legal language understanding
- Limited e-signature capabilities
- Enterprise-focused deployment model
Where organizations often encounter challenges:
- Complex implementation requiring technical resources
- Limited customization in reports and dashboards
- OCR struggles with low-quality documents
- Restrictive pricing model with limited transparency
According to market research from 6sense, Evisort holds approximately 0.31% of the contract management market share as of 2025, with a primarily enterprise-focused customer base (6sense, 2025).
One Evisort customer noted on Capterra: “It was very challenging to even get ballpark cost estimates for several weeks. My inability to bring even roughed-out potential price ranges back to my team created a lot of internal problems” (Capterra, 2025).
Concord: Complete contract management
Our platform delivers end-to-end contract lifecycle management covering:
- Intuitive contract creation with templates and clause libraries
- Seamless real-time negotiation with comments and tracked changes
- Integrated electronic signature at no additional cost
- Straightforward approval workflows
- Actionable analytics and reporting
The most significant differentiator? Concord offers an intuitive user experience with implementation measured in days rather than months, while delivering the comprehensive capabilities that modern organizations need.
A customer from a global real estate company explains: “Concord was able to answer every single question when asked. Unlike competitors, who had to schedule weeks ahead to get AI experts on the phone. We quickly realized that choosing Concord would de-risk the timeline and find success.”
Implementation: How fast can you get started?
The time and resources required to implement a contract management solution represent a significant factor in the total cost of ownership:
Implementation comparison table
Implementation Aspect | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Average setup time | 1-2 days | 30+ days |
Technical expertise required | Minimal | Significant |
Implementation process | Streamlined with success team guidance | Complex, consultant-driven |
User training requirements | Intuitive interface with minimal training | Extensive technical training required |
Data migration complexity | Automated data mapping | Complex manual configuration |
Custom configuration | User-friendly setup | Technical setup requiring specialists |
Time to first value | 1-3 days | 30+ days |
Implementation resources | Dedicated success managers, efficient training | Technical consultants, extensive training program |
Evisort implementation typically takes 30+ days to complete, according to customer testimonials. The process requires significant technical resources and specialized expertise to configure the AI components correctly.
One reviewer notes on Capterra that while Evisort offers powerful capabilities, “The system does not recognize users to register them as contract administrator” and configuration can be challenging (Capterra, 2025).
Concord takes a fundamentally different approach with a 1-2 day implementation that includes proper workflow setup and integration with existing systems. This dramatic efficiency difference delivers immediate business value without the extended deployment timeline.
Our streamlined onboarding process ensures customers can begin realizing value almost immediately, with minimal disruption to existing workflows.
User experience: Will people actually use it?
Even the most powerful software fails to deliver value if user adoption is weak:
User experience comparison table
UX Aspect | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Interface design | Clean, intuitive layout | Complex, AI-focused interface |
Learning curve | Low to moderate | Steep |
User onboarding | Self-guided with support options | Requires consultant-driven training |
Mobile experience | Fully-featured mobile apps | Limited mobile functionality |
Personalization | User-friendly configuration | Technical configuration process |
Accessibility | Enhanced accessibility options | Basic accessibility features |
Interface feedback | “Intuitive like Gmail” | “Technical but powerful” |
User adoption challenges | High adoption rates | Significant training requirements |
Support resources | Interactive guides, responsive support | Technical documentation, tiered support |
Evisort offers extensive AI-powered functionality wrapped in a complex interface. Reviewers note the platform can be difficult to navigate and may create productivity bottlenecks for teams without technical expertise.
According to user feedback on Capterra: “Reports and dashboards are not customizable. There are workarounds like creating custom searches and lists, but generating custom reports would be a really nice feature” (Capterra, 2025).
Concord takes a different approach by balancing power with usability:
- An interface that feels like Gmail for maximum familiarity
- Intuitive navigation that reduces training requirements
- Mobile apps designed for productivity on-the-go
- Contextual guidance that helps users accomplish tasks
Users consistently praise Concord’s intuitive design and ease of use, leading to higher adoption rates and faster time-to-value.
AI capabilities: Smart contract management
AI is transforming contract management in 2025, with significant differences in implementation approach:
AI capabilities comparison table
AI Capability | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Data extraction | ✓ Comprehensive extraction with validation | ✓ Advanced data extraction with technical setup |
OCR technology | ✓ Advanced intelligent document processing | ✓ OCR with limitations on low-quality documents |
Risk identification | ✓ Automated risk flagging and scoring | ✓ Manual risk identification |
Compliance monitoring | ✓ AI-powered compliance checking | ✓ Basic compliance validation |
Contract analysis | ✓ Deep semantic analysis | ✓ Technical machine learning analysis |
Obligation extraction | ✓ Comprehensive obligation management | ✓ Basic obligation tracking |
Performance analytics | ✓ AI-driven performance insights | ✓ Limited customizable reporting |
Benchmarking | ✓ Industry-specific benchmarking | ✓ Limited benchmarking capabilities |
Processing speed | Immediate results | Variable processing times |
Accuracy improvement | 90%+ accuracy with continuous learning | Depends on document quality |
AI training model | Pre-trained with industry-specific learning | Requires extensive custom training |
Evisort focuses heavily on machine learning capabilities:
- Advanced document processing and extraction
- Technical OCR implementation
- Complex AI configuration requirements
Reviewers note that “Evisort functionality could stand to improve their artificial intelligence when it comes to pulling some of the more complex provisions with nuanced timelines” and “OCR struggles to pick up information on low-quality PDFs” (HyperStart, 2025).
Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform delivers:
- Comprehensive data extraction with verification
- Automated risk identification and flagging
- Continuous compliance monitoring
- Complete obligation tracking
- Actionable performance insights
Our pre-trained AI models require minimal configuration while delivering superior results across a wide range of document types and conditions.
Integrations: Playing nice with your tech stack
The ability to connect seamlessly with existing tools drives significant value in contract management:
Integration comparison table
Integration Type | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
CRM Systems | ✓ Salesforce (bidirectional with advanced workflows)<br>✓ HubSpot (native integration)<br>✓ Microsoft Dynamics 365 (via Zapier)<br>✓ Pipedrive (via Zapier) | ✓ Salesforce (basic integration)<br>✓ Limited support for other CRMs |
E-Signature | ✓ Native e-signature (included)<br>✓ Compatible with external e-signature tools | ✓ Limited e-signature capabilities<br>✓ Third-party integrations required |
Cloud Storage | ✓ Google Drive (native)<br>✓ Dropbox (native)<br>✓ Box (native)<br>✓ OneDrive (native) | ✓ Basic cloud storage connections |
Collaboration Tools | ✓ Slack (native)<br>✓ Microsoft Teams (via Zapier)<br>✓ Asana (via Zapier) | ✓ Limited collaboration tool support |
Identity Management | ✓ SAML 2.0, LDAP, Azure AD | ✓ Basic identity management |
Automation Platform | ✓ Zapier integration to 7000+ apps | ✓ Limited middleware options |
API Access | ✓ Developer-friendly API | ✓ Complex API requiring technical expertise |
Implementation Complexity | Low – connects in minutes | High – requires technical resources |
Evisort offers integration focused primarily on:
- Basic Salesforce connection
- Limited e-signature integration
- Selected enterprise systems
- Minimal collaboration tools
Concord provides an extensive integration ecosystem:
- Straightforward Salesforce connection with bidirectional data flow
- HubSpot integration for marketing and sales alignment
- Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, and OneDrive for document storage
- Slack integration for real-time notifications
- Microsoft Teams connectivity
- Zapier connection to 7,000+ apps
- Developer-friendly API
According to market intelligence from 6sense, Concord has captured a 14.23% market share in the contract management space compared to Evisort’s 0.31%, partially due to this integration flexibility (6sense, 2025).
For teams with diverse tech stacks, our integration capabilities create a more seamless workflow across different business functions.
Pricing: What will it cost?
The financial impact of contract management platforms extends far beyond the monthly subscription:
Pricing comparison table
Pricing Aspect | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Pricing model | Transparent, predictable structure | Enterprise-only pricing |
Starting price | $399/month | Custom pricing requiring sales engagement |
Entry-level plan | Essential: $399/month | Not available to small businesses |
Mid-tier plan | Professional: Custom pricing | Custom pricing only |
Advanced plan | Enterprise: Custom pricing | Custom pricing only |
User limitations | Flexible user model | Complex user permissioning |
Contract volume limits | Flexible scaling options | Tiered volume pricing |
Additional costs | Minimal implementation costs | Substantial implementation, consulting, training fees |
Pricing transparency | Published pricing structure | Limited transparency, enterprise sales model |
Free trial | Demo available | Demo only |
Annual discount | Available | Available |
Evisort employs a complex enterprise pricing model that typically requires engaging with sales for a custom quote. Customer feedback indicates considerable challenge in obtaining even basic pricing information, with one reviewer noting, “It was very challenging to even get ballpark cost estimates for several weeks” (Capterra, 2025).
Implementation costs, training, and ongoing consulting often represent a substantial portion of the total investment, frequently extending the budget well beyond initial expectations.
Concord starts at $399/month with a transparent structure based on your specific requirements. All plans include unlimited e-signatures and document storage, with features that scale as your organization grows.
Our transparent pricing model eliminates surprise costs and enables organizations to budget with confidence.
ROI and business impact
The ultimate measure of any software investment is its impact on business outcomes:
ROI comparison table
ROI Factor | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Time-to-value | Fast (days to weeks) | Slow (months+) |
Implementation costs | Low to moderate | High |
Administrative savings | 50-70% reduction in admin time | 30-50% reduction in admin time |
Contract cycle time reduction | 40-75% reduction in cycle time | 20-40% reduction in cycle time |
Renewal opportunity capture | Comprehensive renewal management | Basic renewal tracking |
Risk mitigation value | Proactive risk identification | Technical risk analysis |
Revenue impact | Direct revenue acceleration | Indirect cost efficiency |
Compliance benefits | Comprehensive compliance transformation | Technical compliance improvements |
Strategic insights | Actionable business intelligence | Technical data extraction |
Typical ROI timeframe | 3-6 months | 12+ months |
ROI multiplier | High (91-183x per dollar invested) | Moderate (requires significant investment) |
Evisort delivers value primarily through:
- Technical AI capabilities for document analysis
- Data extraction from contract documents
- Enterprise-focused workflow capabilities
- Basic risk analysis tools
However, the extended implementation timeline and significant technical requirements can delay ROI realization, with some customers noting 30+ days before seeing initial value.
Concord delivers more rapid returns through:
- Complete lifecycle efficiency improvements
- Accelerated contract creation and approval
- Streamlined negotiation and execution
- Significant legal resource optimization
- Strategic insights driving business decisions
For every dollar invested in our contract management solution, companies typically generate between $91 and $183 in recovered revenue.
Market position and future growth
The contract management software market is experiencing significant growth, with important trends to note:
Market position comparison
Market Aspect | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Market share | 14.23% (leading position) | 0.31% |
Customer base | 1,368+ companies (diverse industries) | 37 companies (primarily enterprise) |
Industry focus | Cross-industry versatility | Limited industry specialization |
Target company size | SMB through enterprise | Enterprise focus |
Geographic strength | Global presence (87% in US) | Limited geographic coverage |
Growth trajectory | Rapid expansion | Limited growth |
Key competitors | DocuSign CLM, SAP Ariba, Deltek | DocuSign CLM, Concord, Conga |
AI development | Industry-leading capabilities | Technical AI focus |
Market perception | Innovative, user-friendly | Complex, technical |
The global contract lifecycle management market is projected to grow significantly, with analyst forecasts showing:
- Growth from $1.07 billion in 2024 to $3.46 billion by 2034, at a CAGR of 12.4% (Fact.MR, 2024)
- Market expectations reaching $2.66 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 12.25% (Mordor Intelligence, 2025)
- Healthcare CLM specifically projected to reach $9.68 billion by 2032 (Data Bridge Market Research, 2025)
According to 6sense, the top alternatives for Evisort in contract management are Concord (20.79% market share), Deltek Costpoint (9.84%), and SAP Ariba Contracts (8.30%) (6sense, 2025).
Which one is right for you?
The best contract lifecycle management software depends on your specific requirements:
Overall comparison: At-a-glance decision matrix
Factor | Concord | Evisort |
---|---|---|
Best suited for | • Organizations valuing rapid implementation<br>• Teams seeking intuitive user experience<br>• Businesses requiring comprehensive integrations<br>• Companies of all sizes | • Large enterprises with significant technical resources<br>• Organizations with dedicated AI specialists<br>• Companies with extensive implementation timelines<br>• Businesses with large technical budgets |
Implementation time | 1-2 days | 30+ days |
Pricing model | Transparent, flexible structure | Complex enterprise model with hidden costs |
Starting price | $399/month | Enterprise pricing (contact sales) |
User experience | Intuitive, Gmail-like interface | Complex with steep learning curve |
AI capabilities | Comprehensive Agreement Intelligence | Technical machine learning focus |
Integration breadth | Extensive ecosystem (7000+ apps) | Limited enterprise integrations |
Customization | User-friendly configuration | Complex technical setup |
Mobile support | Fully-featured mobile applications | Limited mobile capabilities |
Customer support | Responsive success team | Technical support model |
ROI timeline | Rapid value realization | Extended payback period |
Evisort might be appropriate if:
- Your organization has dedicated technical AI specialists
- You can accommodate a 30+ day deployment timeline
- Your budget can absorb substantial implementation and training costs
- Your contracts require highly specialized AI analysis
Concord is ideal for:
- Organizations seeking end-to-end contract lifecycle management
- Teams valuing rapid implementation and time-to-value
- Businesses requiring intuitive user experience
- Companies needing comprehensive tech stack integration
- Organizations focusing on user adoption and productivity
- Teams looking for advanced AI-powered insights without technical complexity
Most growing organizations find that Concord delivers significantly more value without the implementation complexity and budget concerns associated with technically-focused platforms.
Ready to experience the difference? Request a demo tailored to your specific use cases and requirements.
Frequently asked questions about Concord vs. Evisort
How long does implementation typically take?
Evisort deployments average 30+ days according to customer testimonials, requiring significant technical resources and specialized AI expertise. Concord implementation typically completes within 1-2 days, reflecting our user-centric design and streamlined onboarding process. This dramatic difference has substantial implications for how quickly your organization can begin realizing value from your contract management investment.
Can both platforms handle the full contract lifecycle?
While both platforms address contract management, Concord provides a more comprehensive and intuitive end-to-end approach, from creation through execution and renewal. Evisort focuses primarily on AI-driven document analysis, requiring additional technical configuration to achieve full lifecycle capabilities.
Which platform offers better AI capabilities?
Evisort provides technically-focused machine learning that requires specialized expertise to fully leverage. Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform delivers more accessible AI capabilities including automated risk identification, compliance monitoring, obligation tracking, and performance analytics. Our approach makes advanced AI accessible to all users, not just technical specialists.
How do the pricing models differ?
Evisort employs an enterprise pricing model with limited transparency and significant hidden costs for implementation, training, and ongoing support. Concord offers transparent pricing starting at $399/month with predictable scaling based on your specific needs. For many organizations, the total cost disparity can be substantial, even before considering implementation timeframes.
Can I try the software before making a decision?
Evisort typically offers limited demos through their enterprise sales team, focusing on generic capabilities rather than your specific use cases. Concord provides a comprehensive personalized demo that showcases how our platform would work for your unique requirements, giving you a more accurate picture of the solution’s value to your organization.
Which integrations do the platforms support?
Evisort primarily integrates with selected enterprise systems with limited support for broader business tools. Concord provides native integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Slack, and more, plus Zapier connectivity to over 7,000 applications – delivering a significantly more versatile ecosystem that adapts to your existing workflows rather than forcing you to adapt to the CLM.
Bibliography
- 6sense. (2025). Concord vs Evisort: Contract Management Comparison.
- 6sense. (2025). Concord – Market Share, Competitor Insights in Contract Management.
- HyperStart. (2025). Evisort Pricing 2025: Plans, Features, & Reviews.
- HyperStart. (2025). Top 5 Evisort Competitors in 2025.
- Capterra. (2025). Evisort Reviews 2025: Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons.
- Fact.MR. (2024). Contract Lifecycle Management Market Forecast.
- Mordor Intelligence. (2025). Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market Growth Trends.
- TrustRadius. (2025). Evisort Reviews & Ratings.
- Data Bridge Market Research. (2025). Healthcare Contract Management Software: The 2025 Guide.
What you get when you use Concord
Get set up in days, not months
Agiloft’s deep customizability means it takes organizations months to implement. Concord onboards most customers in under 3 weeks, so teams can start streamlining processes quickly.
Unlimited e-signature, at no extra cost
Agiloft integrates with several e-signature providers but does not offer a native e-signature. Concord’s native e-signature is secure and legally binding, so while you can integrate with DocuSign or another e-signature platform, you won’t have to.
Automatically send signed contracts to Google Drive, Box, or Dropbox
Agiloft enables users to download all contracts and attached files. Concord’s out-of-the-box integrations with Google Drive, Box, and Dropbox automatically sends signed contracts to these additional storage systems.
Simple approval workflow editor
Agiloft’s graphical workflows give administrators a visual way to organize their approvals, but its complexity is time-intensive. Concord’s approval workflows are designed to quickly route the contract to the right person or team based on company-wide rules or the value of a field.