Feature | Concord | ContractBook |
---|---|---|
Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
Approval workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
Audit trails | ✓ | ✓ |
Internal/public discussion | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrations with Salesforce | ✓ Native | ✓ Via Zapier |
Open API | ✓ | ✓ |
Unlimited storage | ✓ | ✗ |
Universal easy-to-learn interface | ✓ | ✗ |
Generate and send multiple contracts at once | ✓ | ✗ |
Clause library | ✓ | ✓ |
Edit in-app | ✓ | ✓ |
Native e-signature | ✓ | ✓ |
Transparent pricing | ✓ | ✗ |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf, .html | .docx, .pdf |
Implementation time | Less than 1 day | 7-14 days |
Starting price | $399/month | $999/month |
Features: What can they actually do?
Concord and ContractBook serve different contract management needs:
Feature comparison table
Feature | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
Contract repository | ✓ Secure, centralized storage | ✓ Secure, centralized storage |
Document search | ✓ Basic full-text search | ✓ AI-powered search with filtering |
OCR technology | ✓ Basic document scanning | ✓ Intelligent document processing |
Email alerts | ✓ Basic notifications | ✓ Comprehensive alert system |
Contract creation | ✓ Template-based authoring | ✓ Advanced template-based authoring |
Negotiation tools | ✓ Basic collaboration | ✓ Real-time collaboration & redlining |
E-signature | ✓ Built-in e-signature | ✓ Built-in e-signature |
Workflow automation | ✓ Basic workflows | ✓ Advanced custom workflows |
AI capabilities | ✓ Basic data extraction | ✓ Agreement Intelligence platform |
Analytics | ✗ Limited reporting | ✓ Advanced analytics & insights |
Mobile access | ✓ Mobile-friendly interface | ✓ Native mobile applications |
API access | ✓ Available | ✓ Robust API ecosystem |
File formats supported | .docx, .pdf | .docx, .pdf, .html |
ContractBook: The document creator
ContractBook focuses primarily on:
Creating contracts from templates
Digital signature capabilities
Basic document storage
Limited collaboration tools
Basic integrations through Zapier
What it doesn’t do well:
Advanced contract analytics
Comprehensive reporting
Complex workflow automation
Deep system integrations
Strategic contract insights
As one ContractBook user explains in a G2 review, “Contractbook makes life easier, ensures consistency across teams and gets contracts signed quicker.”
Concord: Complete contract management
Concord delivers end-to-end contract management software that covers:
Contract creation with robust templates and clause libraries
Real-time negotiation with comments and tracked changes
Built-in electronic signature (no extra DocuSign fees)
Comprehensive approval workflows
Advanced analytics and reporting
AI-powered data extraction
The most significant differentiator? Concord handles the entire contract process in one platform with deeper capabilities throughout the lifecycle, while ContractBook concentrates primarily on document creation and e-signing.
Implementation: How fast can you get started?
Getting contract software up and running is where many companies first feel the pain. Here’s what to expect with these platforms:
Implementation comparison table
Implementation Aspect | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
Average setup time | 7-14 days | Less than 1 day |
Technical expertise required | Moderate | Minimal |
Implementation process | Multi-step with vendor support | Streamlined with success team |
User training requirements | Moderate learning curve | Simple, intuitive interface |
Data migration complexity | Moderate | Simple with AI assistance |
Custom configuration | Limited flexibility | Extensive customization |
Time to first value | 1-2 weeks | Same day |
Implementation resources | Documentation, limited support | Dedicated success managers |
ContractBook requires a multi-step implementation process, typically taking 7-14 days to get fully operational. The platform has a steeper learning curve than its marketing suggests.
One ContractBook reviewer notes on SoftwareSuggest, “There could be more convenience in utilizing the item. The platform can be slow sometimes which makes it difficult to use it smoothly and efficiently.”
Concord offers a remarkably streamlined implementation process, with most organizations up and running in less than a day. The intuitive interface requires minimal training, and the AI-assisted data migration simplifies contract importation.
According to research from HyperStart, Concord helps “close contracts faster and reduce contract management efforts with intelligent automation.”
The stark difference in implementation time gives Concord a significant advantage for organizations that need to quickly implement a contract management solution without extensive IT resources.
User experience: Will people actually use it?
Even powerful software fails if nobody wants to use it:
User experience comparison table
UX Aspect | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
Interface design | Modern but complex | Clean, intuitive |
Learning curve | Moderate | Low |
User onboarding | Documentation-heavy | Guided with support |
Mobile experience | Mobile-friendly interface | Native mobile applications |
Personalization | Limited | Extensive user customization |
Accessibility | Basic features | Enhanced accessibility |
Interface feedback | “Sometimes sluggish” | “Intuitive like Gmail” |
User adoption challenges | Moderate – May require training | Few – Quick adoption typical |
Support resources | Documentation, email support | Interactive guides, dedicated support |
ContractBook features a modern interface that, while visually appealing, can be complicated to navigate for new users. The platform requires a learning investment before teams can use it effectively.
According to a ContractSafe blog post, users have described ContractBook’s interface as “a bit confusing at times” and noted that “setting it up can take some time.”
Concord prioritizes usability with an interface frequently compared to Gmail in its intuitive design. The platform strikes an excellent balance between powerful features and ease of use, promoting high adoption rates.
A G2 reviewer explains, “I like that the format is similar to gmail, so it is simple, and intuitive to use.”
The significant difference in usability translates directly to adoption rates – Concord users typically start working with the platform immediately, while ContractBook often requires more substantial onboarding and training.
AI capabilities: Smart vs. smarter
AI is transforming contract management in 2025, but implementation varies dramatically:
AI capabilities comparison table
AI Capability | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
Data extraction | ✓ Basic data extraction | ✓ Comprehensive extraction with validation |
OCR technology | ✓ Standard OCR | ✓ Advanced intelligent document processing |
Risk identification | ✗ Not available | ✓ Automated risk flagging and scoring |
Compliance monitoring | ✗ Limited | ✓ AI-powered compliance checking |
Contract analysis | ✓ Basic term identification | ✓ Deep semantic analysis |
Obligation extraction | ✗ Not available | ✓ Comprehensive obligation management |
Performance analytics | ✗ Not available | ✓ AI-driven performance insights |
Benchmarking | ✗ Not available | ✓ Comparison against industry standards |
Processing speed | Moderate | Fast (seconds per document) |
Accuracy improvement | Limited | Significant (10%+ over manual review) |
AI training model | General | Industry and customer-specific learning |
ContractBook offers some AI functionality for basic contract creation and data extraction, but its capabilities are limited to fundamental use cases like identifying parties and dates.
Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform delivers substantially more advanced AI features:
Comprehensive data extraction with validation
Risk identification and flagging
Compliance monitoring
Obligation tracking
Performance analytics and insights
As Matt Lhoumeau, CEO of Concord, explains on the Concord website: “By automating the extraction and entry of key terms, our users can focus on strategic tasks rather than tedious administrative work.”
The efficiency gains are substantial. According to research cited in Concord’s healthcare guide, AI can complete contract reviews in approximately 26 seconds compared to 92 minutes for human reviewers, while achieving 10% higher accuracy.
Integrations: Playing nice with your tech stack
The ability to connect with your existing tools is crucial for any contract solution:
Integration comparison table
Integration Type | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
CRM Systems | ✓ HubSpot (via Zapier) | ✓ Salesforce (native) |
E-Signature | ✓ Native e-signature | ✓ Native e-signature |
Cloud Storage | ✓ Google Drive (via Zapier) | ✓ Google Drive (native) |
Collaboration Tools | ✓ Slack (via Zapier) | ✓ Slack (native) |
Identity Management | ✓ Basic SSO | ✓ SAML 2.0, LDAP, Azure AD |
Automation Platform | ✓ Zapier (3000+ apps) | ✓ Zapier (7000+ apps) |
API Access | ✓ Basic API | ✓ Comprehensive API ecosystem |
Implementation Complexity | Moderate – Complex | Simple – Moderate |
ContractBook offers integrations primarily through Zapier, with connections to approximately 3,000 applications. This approach provides breadth but lacks the deep integration capabilities of native connections.
According to GetApp, ContractBook integrates with tools including “HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, allowing you to embed contract management into your existing workflows.”
Concord provides a significantly more extensive contract automation software ecosystem:
Native Salesforce integration with bidirectional data flow
HubSpot integration for marketing and sales alignment
Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, and OneDrive for document storage
Slack integration for real-time notifications
Microsoft Teams connectivity
Zapier connection to 7,000+ apps
Robust API for custom integrations
According to HyperStart, “Concord helps close contracts faster and reduce contract management efforts with intelligent automation. With integration support for 5,000+ business applications, Concord offers 360-degree connectivity in your CLM and business processes.”
For teams with complex tech stacks, Concord’s native integrations and robust API provide a significant advantage over ContractBook’s Zapier-dependent approach.
Pricing: What will it cost?
Both platforms structure their pricing differently, with significant implications for total cost:
Pricing comparison table
Pricing Aspect | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
Pricing model | Plan-based subscription | Flexible based on needs |
Starting price | $999/month | $399/month |
Entry-level plan | Foundation: $999/month | Essential: $399/month |
Mid-tier plan | Custom pricing | Professional: Custom pricing |
Advanced plan | Enterprise: Custom pricing | Enterprise: Custom pricing |
User limitations | Limited by plan | Flexible |
Contract volume limits | Tiered based on plan | Flexible scaling options |
Additional costs | Add-ons for specific departments ($395/month each) | Limited |
Pricing transparency | Limited transparency | Clear structure |
Free trial | Available | Demo available (no free trial) |
Annual discount | Available | Available |
ContractBook pricing starts at approximately $999/month for their Foundation plan based on SoftwareSuggest data. Additional functionality requires department-specific add-ons at $395/month per add-on, which can quickly increase costs.
Concord offers more transparent pricing that starts at $399/month with flexible options based on specific needs. All plans include core functionality with clear scaling pathways.
The significant price difference – with Concord starting at less than half the cost of ContractBook’s entry-level plan – makes Concord considerably more accessible, especially for growing organizations.
ROI and business impact
Ultimately, the value of any software investment must be measured by its impact on business outcomes:
ROI comparison table
ROI Factor | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
Time-to-value | 1-2 weeks | Less than 1 day |
Implementation costs | Moderate | Low |
Administrative savings | 20-40% reduction in admin time | 40-60% reduction in admin time |
Contract cycle time reduction | 20-30% reduction | 40-75% reduction in cycle time |
Renewal opportunity capture | Moderate – Basic reminders | Very high – Proactive management |
Risk mitigation value | Limited | High |
Revenue impact | Indirect – Process improvement | Direct – Revenue acceleration |
Compliance benefits | Basic improvements | Comprehensive compliance transformation |
Strategic insights | Limited | Extensive |
Typical ROI timeframe | 3-6 months | 1-3 months |
ROI multiplier | Moderate | High (91-183x per dollar invested) |
ContractBook delivers value primarily through:
Basic document creation efficiency
E-signature capabilities
Simple storage and organization
Process standardization
One reviewer on SoftwareSuggest notes, “We have successfully used ContractBook to automate much of our patient sign-up process, saving us time and money.”
Concord delivers more comprehensive returns through:
Full lifecycle efficiency improvements
Accelerated contract creation and approval
Streamlined negotiation and execution
Reduced legal review requirements
Strategic insights from contract analytics
According to Concord’s research shared on their procurement software page, “For every dollar invested in contract management software, companies can expect to generate between $91 and $183 in recovered revenue.”
Industry research shows that organizations implementing CLM software typically aim for a minimum 3:1 benefit-to-cost ratio, or a 300% ROI, according to Concord’s procurement guide.
Market position and growth trajectory
The contract management software market is experiencing significant growth, with important trends to note:
Market position comparison
Market Aspect | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
Market share | Growing | 14.23% (leading position) |
Customer base | 250,000+ users across 85 countries | 1,500+ companies and 1M+ users |
Industry focus | SMBs, mid-market | SMB through enterprise |
Target company size | 10+ employee companies | All business sizes |
Geographic strength | European focus (Denmark-based) | Global presence (US-based) |
Growth trajectory | Moderate | Rapid |
Founding year | 2017 | 2014 |
Key investors | Tiger Global, Gradient Ventures | Strong funding history |
AI development | Moderate | Advanced |
Market perception | Contract creation tool | Comprehensive CLM platform |
According to research from Mordor Intelligence, Concord is among the major companies operating in the contract lifecycle management software market, alongside providers like ContractWorks and Zycus.
The global contract lifecycle management market is projected to grow from $1.49 billion in 2025 to $2.66 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 12.25%, highlighting the increasing importance of advanced CLM solutions like those offered by Concord.
Which one is right for you?
The best contract lifecycle management software depends on your specific needs:
Overall comparison: At-a-glance decision matrix
Factor | ContractBook | Concord |
---|---|---|
Best suited for | • Organizations focused on document creation | • Full lifecycle contract management needs |
Implementation time | 7-14 days | Less than 1 day |
Pricing model | Plan-based with add-ons | Flexible based on needs |
Starting price | $999/month | $399/month |
User experience | Modern but complex | Intuitive, Gmail-like interface |
AI capabilities | Basic | Comprehensive Agreement Intelligence |
Integration breadth | 3,000+ apps via Zapier | 5,000+ apps with native integrations |
Customization | Limited | Extensive |
Mobile support | Mobile-friendly interface | Native mobile applications |
Customer support | Variable quality | Dedicated success managers |
ROI timeline | 3-6 months | 1-3 months |
Choose ContractBook if:
Your primary focus is document creation and e-signature
You have relatively simple contract processes
You’re based in Europe and want a European vendor
You have minimal integration requirements
You don’t need advanced analytics or insights
Choose Concord if:
You need end-to-end contract lifecycle management
You want implementation in less than a day
Your budget favors a lower starting price point
You require advanced AI capabilities
You need robust integrations with your tech stack
You want strategic insights from your contracts
Most growing organizations find that Concord delivers significantly more value at a considerably lower cost, with faster implementation and more comprehensive capabilities.
Want to see Concord in action? Request a demo tailored to your specific use cases and requirements.
Frequently asked questions about Concord vs. ContractBook
Bibliography
Mordor Intelligence: Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market Growth Trends
SoftwareSuggest: 25 Best Contract Lifecycle Management Software
Thousands of companies trust Concord
VP OF LEGAL View all testimonials