• Familiar user interface Features for all teams, not just Sales
• Unlimited e-signatures, at no extra charge
• Online negotiation
• Bulk send 100+ documents
• Transparent pricing

• Set up in less than a day (compared to weeks for Conga)
• Intuitive interface that feels like using Gmail
• Built-in e-signature that eliminates extra costs
• AI that extracts key contract data automatically
• If you need a robust contract solution without complexity and budget-busting prices, Concord hits the sweet spot of power and usability.

Features: What can they actually do?

Concord and Conga serve different contract management needs:

Feature comparison table

Conga: Enterprise complexity

Conga CLM is designed for large enterprises with complex contract management needs:

• Extensive customization options that require technical expertise

• Robust integration with other Conga products

• Multiple modules for different contract functions

• Complex approval workflows

• Advanced reporting for enterprise compliance

While powerful, Conga’s complexity comes at a cost – both financially and in terms of implementation difficulty. As reported on HyperStart’s blog, “Conga CLM has all the functionalities expected from a CLM. However, the platform isn’t user-friendly. It is difficult to toggle between pages or go back and forth.”

Concord: Complete contract management

Concord delivers end-to-end contract management software that covers:

• Contract creation with templates and clause libraries

• Real-time negotiation with comments and tracked changes

• Built-in electronic signature (no extra fees)

• Comprehensive approval workflows

• Advanced analytics and reporting

The most significant differentiator? Concord’s focus on usability makes powerful contract management accessible to everyone in your organization. According to Concord’s comparison page, Concord’s “Google Doc-like interface is built with the entire organization in mind — Legal, Sales, Procurement, HR, and more.”

Implementation: How fast can you get started?

Getting contract software up and running is where many companies first feel the pain. Here’s what to expect with these platforms:

Implementation comparison table

Conga requires a significant time investment to implement. According to Concord’s comparison with Conga, “Conga Contracts’ complexity means there is a heavy initial time investment.” With enterprise-level features comes enterprise-level implementation complexity.

Concord strikes the perfect balance with a setup time of less than a day. The platform’s intuitive design allows for quick adoption with minimal training. Most customers can be up and running almost immediately, bringing contracts under management from day one.

The right choice depends on your timeline and complexity needs. If you want immediate results, Concord works. Conga’s lengthy implementation time might eventually deliver powerful capabilities, but most organizations need faster time-to-value than Conga can provide.

User experience: Will people actually use it?

Even powerful software fails if nobody wants to use it:

User experience comparison table

Conga has a steep learning curve that can discourage adoption. Users on GetApp report that “It’s not intuitive, people who don’t use the system daily have a hard time navigating through it.”

Concord balances power with usability through:

• An interface that “feels like Gmail” according to users

• Intuitive navigation despite deeper functionality

• Mobile apps for on-the-go contract management

• Contextual help that guides users through processes

As one reviewer on Capterra put it: “The tracking capabilities and the ability to assign different levels of access in Concord is a huge benefit and is going to be a game changer in terms of staff time spent on contract review.”

AI capabilities: Smart vs. smarter

AI is transforming contract management in 2025, but implementation varies dramatically:

AI capabilities comparison table

Conga uses AI primarily for:

• Basic data extraction

• Template selection

• Simple term identification

According to Conga’s website, their AI can “transform static documents into data to speed contract review and negotiation,” but reviews suggest the implementation may not be as robust as marketed.

Concord’s Agreement Intelligence platform goes much further:

• Comprehensive data extraction with validation

• Risk identification and flagging

• Compliance monitoring

• Obligation tracking

• Performance analytics and insights

The efficiency gains are substantial. According to research, advanced AI can complete contract reviews in approximately 26 seconds compared to 92 minutes for human reviewers, while achieving significantly higher accuracy.

Integrations: Playing nice with your tech stack

The ability to connect with your existing tools is crucial for any contract solution:

Integration comparison table

Conga offers strong integration with the Salesforce ecosystem but may have limitations with other platforms. According to a review on TitanDXP, “Conga CLM is not entirely compatible with Conga Salesforce Lightning and, therefore, causes unforeseen problems for businesses.”

Concord provides a much more extensive contract automation software ecosystem:

• Native Salesforce integration with bidirectional data flow

• HubSpot integration for marketing and sales alignment

• Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, and OneDrive for document storage

• Slack integration for real-time notifications

• Microsoft Teams connectivity

• Zapier connection to 7,000+ apps

• Robust API for custom integrations

According to HyperStart’s blog, Concord “offers 360-degree connectivity in your CLM and business processes” with integration support for 5,000+ business applications.

For teams with complex tech stacks, Concord’s integration capabilities create a more seamless workflow across systems.

Pricing: What will it cost?

Both platforms structure their pricing differently, impacting your total cost:

Pricing comparison table

Conga uses a per-user pricing model with separate costs for different modules:

• Basic plan starts at $35/user/month with limited features

• Advanced features require additional modules at higher costs

• Implementation services add significant expense

• E-signature (Conga Sign) is a separate cost

According to HyperStart, “Conga CLM pricing tiers are not published on the website” making it difficult to predict total costs.

Concord starts at $399/month with an all-inclusive pricing structure. All plans include unlimited e-signatures and document storage, with features that scale as you grow.

For detailed pricing information tailored to your organization, you can explore Concord’s pricing details.

ROI and business impact

Ultimately, the value of any software investment must be measured by its impact on business outcomes:

ROI comparison table

Conga delivers value through:

• Standardized contract processes

• Template management

• Integration with Salesforce

• Workflow automation

• Risk reduction

A Conga customer testimonial on their website reports that implementing Conga CLM allowed them to “triple the percentage of transactions that are self-service enabled.” Another customer reported a 70% reduction in contract turnaround time.

Concord delivers more comprehensive returns through:

• Full lifecycle efficiency improvements

• Accelerated contract creation and approval

• Streamlined negotiation and execution

• Reduced legal review requirements

• Strategic insights from contract analytics

According to Concord’s research shared on their procurement software page, “For every dollar invested in contract management software, companies can expect to generate between $91 and $183 in recovered revenue.”

Industry research shows that organizations implementing CLM software typically aim for a minimum 3:1 benefit-to-cost ratio, or a 300% ROI – a target that Concord helps organizations achieve much faster than Conga.

Market position and future growth

The contract management software market is experiencing significant growth, with some important trends to note:

Market position comparison

According to 6sense market intelligence, Concord holds a commanding 22.29% market share in the contract management space compared to Conga CLM’s 1.95%. Concord has 3,043 customers versus Conga’s 266 customers, indicating much broader market adoption.

This data shows that Concord isn’t just a better product – it’s the market leader by a significant margin. PeerSpot reports that as of 2025, “the mindshare of Concord is 0.5%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is 2.1%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year,” showing both platforms losing some mindshare in that particular measurement.

Which one is right for you?

The best contract lifecycle management software depends on your specific needs:

Overall comparison: At-a-glance decision matrix

Choose Conga if:

• You’re a large enterprise with dedicated technical resources

• You’re heavily invested in the Salesforce ecosystem

• You need highly specialized contract workflows

• You have the time and budget for a lengthy implementation

• Your organization has a dedicated CLM team

Choose Concord if:

• You need to implement quickly (in less than a day)

• You want an intuitive interface that requires minimal training

• You need built-in e-signature without additional costs

• You require integration with a wide range of business applications

• You want AI-powered insights from your contracts

Most growing organizations find that Concord delivers significantly more value without the implementation complexity and cost of traditional enterprise CLM platforms like Conga.

Want to see Concord in action? Request a demo tailored to your specific use cases and requirements.

Frequently asked questions about Concord vs. Conga

Bibliography

1. Concord’s Conga Contracts Comparison

2. Concord vs Conga on Capterra

3. 6sense Market Share Analysis

4. Concord Contract Management Software

5. Concord’s Best Contract Lifecycle Management Software

6. HyperStart’s Conga Competitors Analysis

7. HyperStart’s Conga CLM Pricing Analysis

8. Conga CLM Features and Overview

9. TitanDXP’s Conga CLM and Salesforce Review

10. PeerSpot Comparison of Concord vs Conga

11. GetApp Conga Contracts Reviews

12. Concord’s Procurement Contract Management Software

13. Concord’s Contract Analytics Software

14. Concord’s Contract Automation Software