How to Choose CLM When You Don't Have Legal Ops
How to Choose CLM When You Don't Have Legal Ops
How to Choose CLM When You Don't Have Legal Ops
How to Choose CLM When You Don't Have Legal Ops
Sep 8, 2025



In-house teams often run lean, juggling urgent business needs with tight headcount. Without a dedicated legal operations function, contracting becomes ad hoc—managed in inboxes, spreadsheets, and scattered drives.
The costs are measurable. World Commerce & Contracting found that poor contract management erodes nearly 9.2 percent of contract value. Deloitte confirmed a still-staggering 8.6 percent in its 2024 update. For a $100 million contract portfolio, that's nearly nine million dollars at risk.
Beyond lost value, fragmented processes delay deal cycles and increase business friction. Deloitte reports contract data lives in an average of 24 systems, making visibility a daily struggle. McKinsey estimates poor supplier performance inflates total costs by 10 to 20 percent—often because contracts lack robust performance clauses or KPI governance.
Contract lifecycle management technology promises to consolidate data, streamline approvals, enforce obligations, and deliver measurable ROI. The challenge for lean teams is selecting and rolling out a CLM platform without dedicated legal ops resources. The answer lies in borrowing proven frameworks from the Association of Corporate Counsel and the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, combined with a data-driven approach to business case building.
Assess your current maturity in 30 minutes
Before drafting requirements, evaluate where your contracting process stands today. The ACC Legal Operations Maturity Model 2.0 breaks down contract management into clear stages.
Early-stage organizations store contracts in shared folders, track manually, and route via email. Intermediate teams use templates, centralized repositories, and standardized approval workflows. Advanced operations feature integrated clause libraries, KPI dashboards, and obligation tracking across the enterprise.
A 30-minute self-assessment helps identify what you have and what's missing. Next, broaden the scope with CLOC's Core 12 framework. While Core 12 covers the full breadth of legal operations, two pillars are especially relevant to CLM adoption: Technology and Business Intelligence.
Even adjacent functions like Project Management and Training highlight where adoption can fail if not managed proactively. This dual framework approach evaluates CLM not as a standalone tool but as part of a bigger operating model. Even if you don't plan to scale into full legal ops maturity immediately, mapping against professional standards gives you credibility when presenting to executives.
Build the business case with time and value metrics
Legal departments know intuitively that contracts consume too much time, but executives need numbers. The simplest approach quantifies impact by translating time savings into dollars.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median lawyer earns $151,160 per year, or $72.67 per hour. If CLM automation reduces review time by two hours per agreement, the savings is about $145 per contract. Multiply that by 1,000 agreements annually, and you've reclaimed $145,000 of lawyer capacity.
Time represents just one part of the equation. The bigger driver is value leakage. WorldCC research shows average 9.2 percent value erosion. Deloitte confirms 8.6 percent, even after years of investment.
McKinsey analysis reveals over 75 percent of contracts lack KPIs, and 80 percent omit benchmarking clauses. Procurement leakage studies show unfulfilled obligations drain two percent of spend.
CLM capabilities map directly to these risks. Obligation tracking reduces compliance leakage. Clause libraries and templates cut exceptions and improve standardization. Dashboards and KPI governance enforce supplier accountability.
The combination of labor cost savings and value protection creates a compelling ROI story. For lean teams, the ability to quantify benefits in dollars differentiates between stalled investment and executive approval.
CLM must-haves for lean teams
Not every CLM feature is essential for small teams. Focus on capabilities that deliver measurable outcomes quickly.
Must-have feature | Outcome delivered |
---|---|
Central, searchable repository | Replaces fragmented storage across Deloitte's documented average of 24 systems |
Templates and clause library | Reduce exception rates, enforce compliance |
Configurable approvals | Cut cycle times, standardize risk thresholds |
Obligation tracking and alerts | Prevent McKinsey's identified two percent spend leakage |
Audit trails and reporting | Support defensibility and KPI governance |
CRM, ERP, and e-signature integrations | Connect contract data with enterprise systems |
Self-service intake for NDAs and playbooks | Reduce legal bottlenecks and free lawyer time |
The ACC maturity model lists many of these as traits of advanced contract management. CLOC places them under its Technology and Business Intelligence pillars.
For teams with analytics ambitions, McKinsey data reveals that robust KPIs and benchmarking clauses are rare but deliver outsized impact. CLM with built-in performance dashboards can elevate contract management from administrative burden to strategic value driver.
Security, compliance, and risk controls
Security is often overlooked in CLM discussions but should be central for in-house counsel. Sensitive agreements require enterprise-grade protections including encryption and data residency aligned with your company's risk profile.
Role-based access controls prevent unauthorized review. Single sign-on integration provides seamless user experience. Audit logs track every edit and approval.
Contracts themselves must be structured to mitigate risk. McKinsey highlights that 40 percent of contracts lack inflation-adjustment clauses, exposing organizations to unnecessary cost spikes. CLM can enforce these clauses systematically, providing key protections are never omitted.
Evaluation rubric and vendor questions
Choosing the right vendor requires balancing functionality with adoption. Use this four-part rubric.
First, evaluate people and process fit. What's the admin overhead? Does the system support template governance? Is change management assistance included?
Second, assess technology fit. Can it consolidate contracts scattered across Deloitte's documented 24 systems? Does it integrate with your CRM, ERP, and e-signature stack?
Third, demand adoption proof. Customer references in your industry. Average time-to-first-value. Built-in training resources.
Fourth, focus on outcomes. KPI dashboards tied to savings and compliance. SLA tracking and obligation management. Reporting aligned with CLOC's Core 12.
This rubric keeps conversations grounded in business outcomes, not vendor feature lists.
Pilot and phased rollout without legal ops
Even without legal ops staff, a disciplined rollout is possible. Start small by picking one contract family such as NDAs, MSAs, or sales agreements.
Limit rollout to one geography or business unit. Define two or three metrics like cycle time, exception rate, and obligations compliance.
Use CLOC's Project Management guidance to plan the rollout as a defined project. Include milestones for user training, data migration, and KPI tracking.
Deloitte emphasizes that contract ROI comes from visibility and consolidation. McKinsey's procurement analysis shows quick wins from obligation tracking and spend control. Anchor your pilot on one or two of these levers.
Once results are measurable, expand systematically. Add contract types incrementally and introduce integrations in phases. A phased approach manages risk and builds credibility with business stakeholders as early wins compound.
Measure what matters to executives
Success requires tracking outcomes that matter to the business, not just system usage. Monitor time to signature from request to execution. Count touchpoints per contract where fewer means more efficiency.
Track percent handled via templates as an indicator of standardization. Measure obligation compliance since missed obligations cost money. Calculate realized versus negotiated savings to capture value retention.
These metrics align directly with ACC's Analytics guidance and CLOC's Business Intelligence pillar. They provide the transparency executives demand when evaluating ROI on new technology.
Make the business case, then scale systematically
Contracting represents one of the few areas where legal can deliver outsized financial impact. The 2024 Deloitte Chief Legal Officer survey found 85 percent of CLOs expect technology adoption to rise, and 82 percent report increasing workloads.
For lean teams, CLM is no longer optional but necessary. With professional frameworks, a data-backed business case, and a phased rollout, even teams without legal ops can choose and implement CLM like seasoned professionals. Start with a self-assessment, focus on ROI levers, measure outcomes, and scale systematically.
Bibliography
World Commerce & Contracting. Overcoming the 10 Pitfalls in Contracting. Link.
Deloitte. Boosting ROI across the contract management lifecycle. Link.
McKinsey. Contracting for performance: Unlocking additional value. Link.
McKinsey. Mitigating procurement value leakage with generative AI. Link.
Association of Corporate Counsel. Legal Operations Maturity Model 2.0. Link.
Corporate Legal Operations Consortium. CLOC Core 12. Link.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Lawyers. Link.
Deloitte. 2024 Chief Legal Officer Strategy Survey. Link.
In-house teams often run lean, juggling urgent business needs with tight headcount. Without a dedicated legal operations function, contracting becomes ad hoc—managed in inboxes, spreadsheets, and scattered drives.
The costs are measurable. World Commerce & Contracting found that poor contract management erodes nearly 9.2 percent of contract value. Deloitte confirmed a still-staggering 8.6 percent in its 2024 update. For a $100 million contract portfolio, that's nearly nine million dollars at risk.
Beyond lost value, fragmented processes delay deal cycles and increase business friction. Deloitte reports contract data lives in an average of 24 systems, making visibility a daily struggle. McKinsey estimates poor supplier performance inflates total costs by 10 to 20 percent—often because contracts lack robust performance clauses or KPI governance.
Contract lifecycle management technology promises to consolidate data, streamline approvals, enforce obligations, and deliver measurable ROI. The challenge for lean teams is selecting and rolling out a CLM platform without dedicated legal ops resources. The answer lies in borrowing proven frameworks from the Association of Corporate Counsel and the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, combined with a data-driven approach to business case building.
Assess your current maturity in 30 minutes
Before drafting requirements, evaluate where your contracting process stands today. The ACC Legal Operations Maturity Model 2.0 breaks down contract management into clear stages.
Early-stage organizations store contracts in shared folders, track manually, and route via email. Intermediate teams use templates, centralized repositories, and standardized approval workflows. Advanced operations feature integrated clause libraries, KPI dashboards, and obligation tracking across the enterprise.
A 30-minute self-assessment helps identify what you have and what's missing. Next, broaden the scope with CLOC's Core 12 framework. While Core 12 covers the full breadth of legal operations, two pillars are especially relevant to CLM adoption: Technology and Business Intelligence.
Even adjacent functions like Project Management and Training highlight where adoption can fail if not managed proactively. This dual framework approach evaluates CLM not as a standalone tool but as part of a bigger operating model. Even if you don't plan to scale into full legal ops maturity immediately, mapping against professional standards gives you credibility when presenting to executives.
Build the business case with time and value metrics
Legal departments know intuitively that contracts consume too much time, but executives need numbers. The simplest approach quantifies impact by translating time savings into dollars.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median lawyer earns $151,160 per year, or $72.67 per hour. If CLM automation reduces review time by two hours per agreement, the savings is about $145 per contract. Multiply that by 1,000 agreements annually, and you've reclaimed $145,000 of lawyer capacity.
Time represents just one part of the equation. The bigger driver is value leakage. WorldCC research shows average 9.2 percent value erosion. Deloitte confirms 8.6 percent, even after years of investment.
McKinsey analysis reveals over 75 percent of contracts lack KPIs, and 80 percent omit benchmarking clauses. Procurement leakage studies show unfulfilled obligations drain two percent of spend.
CLM capabilities map directly to these risks. Obligation tracking reduces compliance leakage. Clause libraries and templates cut exceptions and improve standardization. Dashboards and KPI governance enforce supplier accountability.
The combination of labor cost savings and value protection creates a compelling ROI story. For lean teams, the ability to quantify benefits in dollars differentiates between stalled investment and executive approval.
CLM must-haves for lean teams
Not every CLM feature is essential for small teams. Focus on capabilities that deliver measurable outcomes quickly.
Must-have feature | Outcome delivered |
---|---|
Central, searchable repository | Replaces fragmented storage across Deloitte's documented average of 24 systems |
Templates and clause library | Reduce exception rates, enforce compliance |
Configurable approvals | Cut cycle times, standardize risk thresholds |
Obligation tracking and alerts | Prevent McKinsey's identified two percent spend leakage |
Audit trails and reporting | Support defensibility and KPI governance |
CRM, ERP, and e-signature integrations | Connect contract data with enterprise systems |
Self-service intake for NDAs and playbooks | Reduce legal bottlenecks and free lawyer time |
The ACC maturity model lists many of these as traits of advanced contract management. CLOC places them under its Technology and Business Intelligence pillars.
For teams with analytics ambitions, McKinsey data reveals that robust KPIs and benchmarking clauses are rare but deliver outsized impact. CLM with built-in performance dashboards can elevate contract management from administrative burden to strategic value driver.
Security, compliance, and risk controls
Security is often overlooked in CLM discussions but should be central for in-house counsel. Sensitive agreements require enterprise-grade protections including encryption and data residency aligned with your company's risk profile.
Role-based access controls prevent unauthorized review. Single sign-on integration provides seamless user experience. Audit logs track every edit and approval.
Contracts themselves must be structured to mitigate risk. McKinsey highlights that 40 percent of contracts lack inflation-adjustment clauses, exposing organizations to unnecessary cost spikes. CLM can enforce these clauses systematically, providing key protections are never omitted.
Evaluation rubric and vendor questions
Choosing the right vendor requires balancing functionality with adoption. Use this four-part rubric.
First, evaluate people and process fit. What's the admin overhead? Does the system support template governance? Is change management assistance included?
Second, assess technology fit. Can it consolidate contracts scattered across Deloitte's documented 24 systems? Does it integrate with your CRM, ERP, and e-signature stack?
Third, demand adoption proof. Customer references in your industry. Average time-to-first-value. Built-in training resources.
Fourth, focus on outcomes. KPI dashboards tied to savings and compliance. SLA tracking and obligation management. Reporting aligned with CLOC's Core 12.
This rubric keeps conversations grounded in business outcomes, not vendor feature lists.
Pilot and phased rollout without legal ops
Even without legal ops staff, a disciplined rollout is possible. Start small by picking one contract family such as NDAs, MSAs, or sales agreements.
Limit rollout to one geography or business unit. Define two or three metrics like cycle time, exception rate, and obligations compliance.
Use CLOC's Project Management guidance to plan the rollout as a defined project. Include milestones for user training, data migration, and KPI tracking.
Deloitte emphasizes that contract ROI comes from visibility and consolidation. McKinsey's procurement analysis shows quick wins from obligation tracking and spend control. Anchor your pilot on one or two of these levers.
Once results are measurable, expand systematically. Add contract types incrementally and introduce integrations in phases. A phased approach manages risk and builds credibility with business stakeholders as early wins compound.
Measure what matters to executives
Success requires tracking outcomes that matter to the business, not just system usage. Monitor time to signature from request to execution. Count touchpoints per contract where fewer means more efficiency.
Track percent handled via templates as an indicator of standardization. Measure obligation compliance since missed obligations cost money. Calculate realized versus negotiated savings to capture value retention.
These metrics align directly with ACC's Analytics guidance and CLOC's Business Intelligence pillar. They provide the transparency executives demand when evaluating ROI on new technology.
Make the business case, then scale systematically
Contracting represents one of the few areas where legal can deliver outsized financial impact. The 2024 Deloitte Chief Legal Officer survey found 85 percent of CLOs expect technology adoption to rise, and 82 percent report increasing workloads.
For lean teams, CLM is no longer optional but necessary. With professional frameworks, a data-backed business case, and a phased rollout, even teams without legal ops can choose and implement CLM like seasoned professionals. Start with a self-assessment, focus on ROI levers, measure outcomes, and scale systematically.
Bibliography
World Commerce & Contracting. Overcoming the 10 Pitfalls in Contracting. Link.
Deloitte. Boosting ROI across the contract management lifecycle. Link.
McKinsey. Contracting for performance: Unlocking additional value. Link.
McKinsey. Mitigating procurement value leakage with generative AI. Link.
Association of Corporate Counsel. Legal Operations Maturity Model 2.0. Link.
Corporate Legal Operations Consortium. CLOC Core 12. Link.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Lawyers. Link.
Deloitte. 2024 Chief Legal Officer Strategy Survey. Link.
About the author

Ben Thomas
Content Manager at Concord
Ben Thomas, Content Manager at Concord, brings 14+ years of experience in crafting technical articles and planning impactful digital strategies. His content expertise is grounded in his previous role as Senior Content Strategist at BTA, where he managed a global creative team and spearheaded omnichannel brand campaigns. Previously, his tenure as Senior Technical Editor at Pool & Spa News honed his skills in trade journalism and industry trend analysis. Ben's proficiency in competitor research, content planning, and inbound marketing makes him a pivotal figure in Concord's content department.
About the author

Ben Thomas
Content Manager at Concord
Ben Thomas, Content Manager at Concord, brings 14+ years of experience in crafting technical articles and planning impactful digital strategies. His content expertise is grounded in his previous role as Senior Content Strategist at BTA, where he managed a global creative team and spearheaded omnichannel brand campaigns. Previously, his tenure as Senior Technical Editor at Pool & Spa News honed his skills in trade journalism and industry trend analysis. Ben's proficiency in competitor research, content planning, and inbound marketing makes him a pivotal figure in Concord's content department.
About the author

Ben Thomas
Content Manager at Concord
Ben Thomas, Content Manager at Concord, brings 14+ years of experience in crafting technical articles and planning impactful digital strategies. His content expertise is grounded in his previous role as Senior Content Strategist at BTA, where he managed a global creative team and spearheaded omnichannel brand campaigns. Previously, his tenure as Senior Technical Editor at Pool & Spa News honed his skills in trade journalism and industry trend analysis. Ben's proficiency in competitor research, content planning, and inbound marketing makes him a pivotal figure in Concord's content department.
Product
Legal




© 2025 Concord. All rights reserved.
Product
Legal




© 2025 Concord. All rights reserved.
Product
Legal




© 2025 Concord. All rights reserved.